Search for: "MURRAY v. STATE"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,310
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2017, 3:44 am
Perhaps surprisingly, the Court unequivocally departs from its decision in R (Kaiyam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 66 (decided less than three years earlier) to endorse the narrower understanding of the obligation set down by the ECtHR in James v UK (App no. 25119/09). [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:06 am
Boyd v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
’[3] On the question of domestic law the Court finds that ‘the law of the United States has been uniform since its founding that corporations can be held liable for the torts committed by their agents. [read post]
18 May 2008, 7:49 am
State v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 11:20 am
United States Second Circuit, 08/02/2010 US v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:37 am
Murray v. amazon.com Services LLC, et al., USDC-NJ, Case No. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 8:41 am
” In Marbury v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:36 am
United States v. 300 Units of Rentable Housing, Case No. 09-35990 (9th Cir. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 5:30 am
The defense filed Preliminary Objections to the allegations of recklessness.In this decision, Judge Sletvold adopted the reasoning of Judge Samuel Murray of the same court in the case of Speight v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 7:03 pm
Gonzaga Univ. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 6:07 am
But here’s another doozy: The People (of California) v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 5:17 am
" But then in House v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 9:30 pm
ICYMI: A Smithsonian curator of medicine and science on Griswold v. [read post]
30 May 2022, 6:01 am
The case is Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 6:30 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 5:25 am
Pitch v. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm
The appeal by way of case stated in the “Twitter joke” case (Chambers v DPP) has been allowed. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 1:13 pm
" Add to that to an earlier transcription that read (as described in today's opinion): "The People also look to Mitchell v[.] [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 12:44 am
The test at stage one is whether there is objectively a reasonable expectation of privacy taking into account all the circumstances of the case, including but not limited to, the so-called Murray factors” (which emerged from the well-known Murray v Express Newspapers plc [2008] EWCA Civ 446 case). [read post]
28 May 2016, 1:14 pm
Five years later the Florida Supreme Court, in Emma Murray v. [read post]
