Search for: "MacDonald v. MacDonald" Results 261 - 280 of 547
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
At this early stage, the plaintiff is required to satisfy the three-part test described in the Supreme Court of Canada decision in RJR-MacDonald Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 1:01 am by Frank Cranmer
MacDonald J held that none of the grounds advanced by the claimants amounted to “an arguable ground for judicial review having a realistic prospect of success” [50]. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 1:54 pm by J
It’s a follow on from LB Havering v Macdonald in the UT earlier this year (see here). [read post]
3 May 2009, 7:09 am by Bob Fraser
  The point at which an easement “materially affects” a purchaser’s use of a property was recently considered by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Macdonald v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 4:00 am by Brooke MacKenzie
The Supreme Court of Canada summarized the applicable principle (from the 1990 decision in MacDonald Estate v Martin) in its 2013 decision in CN Railway v McKercher as follows: A lawyer cannot act in a matter where he may use confidential information obtained from a former or current client to the detriment of that client. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
The next significant case in the Supreme Court of Canada addressing lawyer-client confidences was MacDonald Estate v. [read post]