Search for: "Maine v. Superior Court"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,002
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2019, 11:58 am
The plaintiffs in San Antonio Fire & Police Pension Fund v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:35 pm
The court ordered that $1,556 of the refund be applied to cure an arrearage in plan payments, $444 be paid to the debtor, and the balance be held by the trustee pending further order of the court. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
In Gray v. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 11:04 am
The first is the common law rule established by New Jersey’s Supreme Court in the case of Pierce v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
I identified three main strategies of sextortion: catfishing, hacking and relationship abuse. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:51 am
Not surprisingly, the main area of dissension in four of the five cases concerns the applicability of discounts under both statutorily and contractually imposed standards of value. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:01 am
” The federal Court of Appeals pointed out that it is not bound by a Maine Superior Court decision because a Maine Superior Court decision does not bind the Maine Law Court. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:00 am
The path taken by the courts in awarding massive punitive damages against foreign states is a dangerous one for two main reasons. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
” Alternatively, in A v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:05 am
My own view is that both the Lemon v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9 See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit, etc R Co v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 3:15 am
For instance, in Qualcomm v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:01 am
V. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
JOB DESCRIPTION Main Responsibilities Work with the IHL team to provide legal advice to the delegation in Washington, and to the ICRC as a whole on matters of IHL, human rights law, national security law, or other U.S. legal issues. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:42 pm
In POET, LLC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:43 am
To be sure, the issue is not entirely settled because the Supreme Court, in Goldwater v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
” He suggests that the Supreme Court’s decision in the recent case of Ortiz v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 5:01 am
Likewise, prospective AI Supreme Court Justices should be measured against the quality of the average candidates for the job—generally experienced, respected appellate judges—rather than against the quality of the average candidate for state trial court. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:30 am
The latest addition to this ill-fated family of cases is entitled Namerow v PediatriCare Associates, LLC, decided last November by a New Jersey Superior Court judge, in which the court enforced a fixed price buy-sell agreement among members of a medical practice where the original certificate of value hadn’t been updated for 16 years at the time of the plaintiff doctor’s retirement from the practice. [read post]
