Search for: "Maines v. Secretary of State"
Results 261 - 280
of 895
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2009, 8:13 am
”) What Mad Men doesn’t say is that abortion remained illegal (except in rare circumstances) in New York until 1970 (three years before Roe v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 3:18 am
On Monday, California state attorney general Xavier Becerra and officials from 18 other states sent a letter to Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross threatening a lawsuit if the Census Bureau includes a question about citizenship on its main 2020 Census form. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:34 am
Apart from its import for U.S. detention policy generally, the development, if true, may have bearing on the factual underpinnings in Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:26 pm
The consultation relied on to make the designation was, however, conducted a little in advance of this, in August 2008.The claimants (who are a small group of professional landlords acting with the support of another 341 of their peers) now seek to quash the designation on the basis that Hyndburn misled the Secretary of State as to the nature of their consultation and also that the consultation they carried out was inadequate.The main ground relied on by Hyndburn at the… [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:32 pm
Kennedy with the decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 3:06 pm
California; and (2) whether the Navajo Nation can state a cognizable claim for breach of trust consistent with the Supreme Court’s holding in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:28 pm
There are some paragraphs of a general nature on a local authority’s responsibilities when considering or arranging out of borough (or more distant) temporary accommodation, drawing on the Supreme Court judgment in Nzolameso v Westminster City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another intervening) [2015] UKSC 22 (our report). [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 8:28 am
Secretary of State of Energy and Climate Change [20.09.2013], Mansfield County Court, in which District Judge Davies, having heard submissions from both parties, ruled in favour of the Defendant (represented by Nabarro LLP) and held that NIHL is not a disease within the meaning of CPR 45.23 and therefore the 62.5% success fee did not apply. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 1:12 pm
(See Clabault v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v SSHD, W & BB v SSHD and Z, G, U & Y v SSHD, heard 30 – 31 January 2012. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Crown Equipment Corp., 501 F.3d 75, 78 (1st Cir. 2007) (applying Maine law); Ahlberg v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 10:45 am
For the convenience of readers, I reiterate from previous postings that Justice Rothstein stated as follows in the CBC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Crown Equipment Corp., 501 F.3d 75, 78 (1st Cir. 2007) (applying Maine law); Ahlberg v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Crown Equipment Corp., 501 F.3d 75, 78 (1st Cir. 2007) (applying Maine law); Ahlberg v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Crown Equipment Corp., 501 F.3d 75, 78 (1st Cir. 2007) (applying Maine law); Ahlberg v. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 5:31 am
The U.N. secretary-general relied—as the depositary of the Rome Statute and according to existing practice (Chapter V)—on determinations made by the U.N. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:41 am
Children are inherently seen to be more vulnerable than adults, and as such the Secretary of State has “historically adopted different, more favourable policies in relation to asylum seekers who are under 18“. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 10:12 am
—Mahatma Gandhi 1Lloyd’s America v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
However, caselaw confirms that welfare is still ‘a primary consideration’ (ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 2 AC 166, [2011] UKSC 4), so it’s going to be a pretty important factor in any consideration of publication, and in many cases it will be determinative. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 6:07 am
What was the main rationale for the order? [read post]
