Search for: "Majors v. Good"
Results 261 - 280
of 17,038
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am
Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
Texas v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm
Taking the third of these reasons first, business model innovations are one good reason for parties to seek greater legal certainty. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 12:56 pm
In Oneok, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 10:29 am
Good morning.In the midst of an ongoing shareholder dispute, Gildan Activewear is now up for sale. [read post]
The Implications of An ICJ Finding that Israel is Committing the Crime Against Humanity of Apartheid
20 Mar 2024, 5:55 am
Secretary General, States, and competent U.N. bodies; drawing up a Statute for a permanent international penal tribunal for trying the crime of apartheid as envisaged by Article V of the Convention; and drawing attention to the role of transnational corporations in sustaining apartheid in Southern Africa. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 12:13 pm
Derived from the case United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:00 am
But, PTSD is a complex disorder with few good available treatments. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:00 pm
There's a review hearing six months later, and in the meantime, Mother does a lot of good stuff; goes to counseling, doesn't miss appointments, has insight into some of her problem, etc. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
On my left: the edge of the off-ramp, a modest guardrail, and a fifty-foot drop. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 5:07 am
Term Limits v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:32 am
The Appellate Division last week in Behler v Tao (read here) affirmed the order below in a 3-2 decision featuring a majority opinion authored by Presiding Justice Sallie Manzanet-Daniels, applying what she labels “explicitly contractarian” Delaware LLC law “sometimes leading to harsh results,” and a dissenting opinion authored by Justice Ellen Gesmer exalting “basic principles of contract law and fundamental fairness. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 2:48 am
So far so good! [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:26 am
That would be certainly a possibility as not only the Berne Convention (Article 2(3)) mandates the protection of inter alia “other alterations of … artistic work”, but derivative works have been also held protectable under UK law (think of the famous Hyperion Records v Sawkins [IPKat here] as an example). [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 12:35 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 9:52 am
In June 2023, in 303 Creative v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 6:56 am
MSCHF’s handbag may be an innovative and provocative artistic statement, but also raises significant legal risks due to its potential infringement on the intellectual property rights of the original luxury brands involved.[19] The handbag project may also be interpreted as an artistic statement challenging the notions of consumerism, brand worship, and the exclusivity of luxury goods, based on the themes of MSCHF’s previous drops. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:29 am
For example, in Atari Interactive, Inc., v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
The Supreme Court explicitly adopted the major questions doctrine in West Virginia v. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:27 pm
They’re not a niche problem; patent trolls filed the majority of patent lawsuits last year and for all the years in which we have good data. [read post]
