Search for: "Maker v. Maker"
Results 261 - 280
of 7,147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Sep 2016, 6:56 am
There was no evidence of actual confusion presented by the University, and it is important to note that confusion does not mean call to mind, as set out in University of Notre Dame v J.C Gourmet FoodImports Co., Inc., Appelle, 703 F.2d 1372 (Fed. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:15 pm
In a close-call case, Otsuka v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:05 am
[Pero, White v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:47 am
In Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 5:25 am
In Coratti v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 9:30 am
See VIP Products, LLC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 11:13 am
The words of the Appellate Division in Perkins v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:58 pm
In Scentsy, Inc. v. deDisse, wickless candle maker Scentsy filed a trademark infringement suit in the District of Idaho. [read post]
20 May 2021, 7:14 am
Tire maker entitled to recover on injunction bond for wrongful prohibition on sale of certain brand tires. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Welton v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
Sanofi Adventis v. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 7:41 am
The lawsuit, Fears v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 2:10 am
The question posed, of course, is not just one of public v. private, but of big government v. small. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 6:00 pm
The long-running battle between toy makers Mattel, Inc. and MGA Entertainment over a line of pouty-lipped dolls continues unabated, and enters a new phase Thursday with the start of a retrial. [read post]
15 Mar 2009, 9:13 am
The editorial can be read here: Drugs v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 7:34 am
Overview: In Martins v. [read post]
1 May 2008, 6:27 am
-V- CITY OF GARY Interlocutory) shows that Appellants' motion for rehearing was denied 1/9/08, that Appellants' motion for transfer was filed 2/7/08, that briefs have been filed, and that Appellants' motion for oral argument was filed 3/17/08. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 8:31 am
" Prior coverage on MUSCLE MIK v MUSCE POWER trade dress here. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 8:14 pm
Basic Research v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:16 am
Oliver Schoen, and his deputy (and the rapporteur on this Huawei v. [read post]
