Search for: "Marcus D. Mays" Results 261 - 280 of 422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2018, 7:41 am by Dominic Adair
Dr Kallenbach provided the counter arguments: SPC waiver would erode originator patent rights and undermine R&D investment into new drugs. [read post]
5 May 2021, 5:05 am by Simon Lester
At the end of the in-depth investigation, if distortive subsidies are identified, the investigated entity may either offer binding commitments or have ‘redressive measures’ imposed on it. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:59 am by Gene Takagi
Rising immunity and modest changes in behavior may explain why cases are declining, but much remains unknown, scientists say. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 7:48 am
That may make the decision simple, said Sen. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 1:11 pm by Will Baude
In the past few weeks, I've had various pieces of commentary on the Court that I thought I'd collect here. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Kasowitz partner Marcus Topel submitted a declaration asserting that Arch couldn't rely on mere allegations to deny coverage. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 1:00 am by Jan von Hein
Jonas Hermann, Rechtsanwalt (D) und Head of Legal and Compliance Central Europe, BASF Österreich GmbH, Wien. * Dr. [read post]
8 Oct 2012, 8:30 am by Marcus Landsberg
An NGO with the proper thrust may be a better solution. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:33 am by Nate Holdren
I wanted to write a book like that; I looked in part to Marcus Rediker’s book The Slave Ship for inspiration. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 4:30 am by Kevin LaCroix
  As apparent recognition that the prospects for the claimants in the market manipulation cases may have improved, some of the defendants are taken steps to reach settlements with the plaintiffs. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 2:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
History and tradition is an important consideration in determining when courts may award nominal damages. [read post]
27 May 2008, 12:21 pm
State of Indiana , a 6-page opinion, Judge May writes:Jeffrey Young appeals his conviction of possession of cocaine, a Class D felony.1 He argues the cocaine was seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution. [read post]