Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 261 - 280
of 5,936
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
Mark Movsesian, First Things: Defining Religion in the Court: on “unaffiliated believers and religio [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:27 am
Those are the questions that the Court of justice addresses in its judgment handed down this morning in the case Beverage City Polska, C-832/21. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
So far so good. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 3:23 am
Fraud: Nature's Sunshine alleged that Petitioner Thrive twice falsely stated that it was using its mark THRIVE on all of the goods in its registration, when it had used the mark only on some of the goods. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:57 am
The weights of product similarity/mark strength were outweighed by the expense of the goods/sophistication of the consumers. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 3:54 am
A TTAB judge once told me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods/services. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 9:02 am
It is decisive how the relevant public perceives the sign if it were used as a trade mark for the goods or services claimed. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 11:23 pm
The Chancellor refused the application the grounds that the stone is not permitted under the Regulations and no good reason had been advanced for allowing an exception. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm
While the infringement action concerned only certain goods and services for which the EU trade mark was registered, the counterclaim was aimed at having the EU trade mark declared invalid in its entirety. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 10:53 am
at 1.45-7(c)(6)(i). [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 4:21 am
There are good arguments on both sides of the motion. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
” Although the test’s threshold is viewed as relatively low, not all cases justify removal, and where the state opposes removal and offers persuasive reasons for why Mesa is not satisfied, the burden is very much on the removing party to provide specific reasons as to why the test is met.[6] The Mesa test remains good law and applies to all removals under section 1442.[7] “Although the statute is ‘liberally construed’… the Supreme Court has cautioned… [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
On Monday, Aug. 28, federal district court Judge Steve C. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
In May 2012, he delivered "A Prudent Regard to Our Own Good? [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:21 am
In a 63-page opinion, the Board dismissed Nautica Apparel's Section 2(d) and Section 43(c) claims in this opposition to registration of the mark NAUTICA for "[r]ecreational vehicles, namely, motor homes. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:07 am
Any good attorney’s first step in preparing a defense is to evaluate the evidence at hand so that they can defend their client from every possible avenue. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 8:22 am
A good example is the ‘jumping puma’ case. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:50 am
Mark Haydock [2023] ECC Liv 2; and Re All Saints Scotby [2023] ECC Car 3. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm
Mr B was represented by Liz Davies KC and the landlord by Mark Warwick KC, so this was high powered argument… The original ground of appeal was that the first instance Judge was wrong to find that the tendering of the cheque amounted to return of the deposit where the cheque was not cashed. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 6:48 am
This reflected the popularity of eugenics among progressives nationally, as catalogued by Princeton University Professor Thomas C. [read post]
