Search for: "Mark Fish v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 456
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2024, 1:56 pm by Mark Walsh
Fish and Wildlife Service interpretation of the Endangered Species Act with respect to distinct populations of Washington state and elsewhere. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 5:13 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
And when lists go on—as a Maine dairy company recently learned the hard way in O’Connor v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
South Dakota (D.S.D. 2011) ("subsequent decisions by the United States Supreme Court expressly cast doubt on the [ ] validity of the special public-interest doctrine" (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Fujii v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 8:12 am by Eric Goldman
Your Service Cleaning and Janitorial’s mark from their prior partnership and then advertised with At Your Service Housekeeping in the same market. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am by Marie Louise
– sound recording copyright royalties and cinematographic works (IP Osgoode) Century 21 v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
: Nine v IceTV: (International Law Office)   Benelux Some new rules of the Director-General of the Benelux Organisation for Intellectual Property with regard to trade mark filings refused on absolute grounds and withdrawal of oppositions: (Class 46)   Brazil Brazil exports agricultural technology to developing world: (IP tango)   Canada Conservatives website faces claims of copyright infringement: (Michael Geist), Canada’s trade mark… [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 8:09 am by Ronald Mann
” Presumably she was referring to the opinion of Chief Justice John Roberts for a unanimous Court in Weyerhauser Co. v US Fish & Wildlife Service. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm by Jennifer Simon, Esq.
  The case is captioned as Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 10:38 am
If you are a famous fish in a small pond, look to a state likely dilution statute. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 6:54 am by Eric Goldman
The advertisement states, “Compare Our Dumpster Smasher–No Franchise Fees, Higher ROI. [read post]
28 May 2009, 11:26 am
The other day we - allegedly belatedly - posted about the Supreme Court's decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am by Cormac Early
Briefly: Stanley Fish has a column on United States v. [read post]