Search for: "Mark Little" Results 261 - 280 of 18,945
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Aug 2011, 8:52 pm
This week's Elephant Post was set up to allow you to have a little fun (at Mark Gediman's and my expense.) [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:37 am
The question whether the right to control Olympic-related advertising trumps the right to sell things that look, sound and act like trade marks but aren't [see yesterday's post here] has caused the IPKat to do a little gentle scratching. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 5:00 am by Steve Baird
The post Classic Trademark Fair Use of Google Mark? [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 6:43 am by Brian Leiter
My former Texas colleague Mark Lemley (now at Stanford) kindly gave me permission to share this little story he posted on Facebook: I have an... [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:45 am
The Board wasted little time in affirming a refusal to register the phrase IS YOUR MORTGAGE CONTRIBUTING TO YOUR WEALTH? [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 4:48 am
Let's just hope that he will stay away from trade mark parodies for a little while. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 1:40 pm by BARBRI
This marks the beginning of my third, and final, year of law school. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
Yesterday morning, the Little Hoover Commission voted to approve the Governor’s Reorganization Plan, subject to the members appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly (Mark Vargas) and the Senate Rules Committee (Jonathan Shapiro) reaching agreement on unspecified language in the Commission’s report. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
 Significantly, the Kat dredged this little gem out of another sadly long judgment: "71 Contrary to the applicants’ contentions, the Board of Appeal did not find that there had been no use as a trade mark on the basis of circular reasoning in assuming that, as the sign is descriptive, it could not be used as a trade mark. 72 ... the Board of Appeal analysed a number of advertisements submitted by the applicants. ... [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 2:20 am by Sean Hayes
Supreme Court Decision 2008Do5897 delivered on January 30, 2009【Violation of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act】 Translation of Official Court Summary  The appearance of a particular singer and the unique actions of others are intangible and variable features close to an impression or image have little function as a fixed mark that differentiates a matter from another matter. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 7:54 am by Peter Hirtle
It makes little sense to require "permission to publish" if one does nothing when someone violates the scope of that permission. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 9:42 pm
This application left DC Comics with little choice. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:51 am
 A limping trade mark is a mark that is never used by itself and which gains support from the "crutch" of another, far stronger trade mark. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 6:40 pm
Following up on my earlier posts today, I have briefly perused the human rights complaints filed against Mark Steyn and Macleans, and have a few top line thoughts, only.Section 2(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms specifically guarantees freedom of the press. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 3:27 am
An interesting little decision on the mechanics of proof of use of trade mark cropped up in the Court of First Instance of the European Communities last Friday in Case Tâ€â [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 5:30 am by Eleanor Vaida Gerhards
The post ABA Forum Takeaway: Will the Trump Era Mark the End of Franchise Regulation? [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:46 am by Buce
Okay, I finished the Greek-reading of the Gospel of Mark last night, with some sense of accomplishment. [read post]