Search for: "Marker v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 521
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2021, 2:34 am
Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October Her Majesty’s Attorney General v Crosland, heard 18th October Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica), heard 19th October Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd, heard 26th October Harpur Trust v Brazel, heard… [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
District Court in Boston under the name of Gill v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:40 am
The 2007 decision in Gonzales v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:58 am
This support of Washington v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 6:20 am
Unlike normative markers, the reduction of democratic ideology to a set of indicators also makes it possible to fine tune the process of identifying and correcting defects, of monitoring, and of disciplining deviance among states. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 4:22 am
State v. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 3:24 am
United States and Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:56 am
” United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 1:19 pm
See Hefley v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
Alternatively, as others have suggested he may be playing the long game, sacrificing a chance to strike down the health care law in order to set new markers on issues including the commerce clause and the spending power. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:19 am
This made stopping out-of-state violators working in New Jersey particularly difficult, as they often left the state before the department could enforce state regulations. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 11:19 am
He also noted other cases involving different-sex couples where courts bound non-biological parents to support obligations, including a recent ruling by the state's highest court, Shondel J. v. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 9:00 am
United States (Nov. 3) Attorney Lori Windham, Fulton v. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 10:16 am
Parts II through V then consider in detail the text and interpretation of the substantive provisions of the UNGP. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Two days later, the United States Supreme Court decided Roe v. [read post]
31 Jan 2014, 1:16 pm
People v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:16 am
How about if he used marker pens to color her teeth like a rainbow? [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
Reddy's Laboratories v Eli Lilly [2009] EWCA Civ 1362 where the judge, having reviewed the EPO jurisprudence on obviousness including Agrevo T 0939/92 stated: "The EPO jurisprudence is founded firmly around a fundamental question: has a patentee made a novel non-obvious technical advance and provided sufficient justification for it to be credible? [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
And only once did I imagine the parties in a case and give them faces – State v. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 11:22 am
Supreme Court ruling in Bostock v. [read post]
