Search for: "Marriage of Perry"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,093
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2013, 6:13 am
Perry (on California’s Prop. 8). [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 10:55 pm
Perry (PDF link to opinion): "Apple strongly supports marriage equality and we consider it a civil rights issue. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 9:00 pm
The Perry decision on Article III standing will be the stuff of Federal Courts courses and law review debates for years to come. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 1:54 pm
And maybe yesterday's events signal that federal litigation is now a better strategy than it was a few years ago, helped by the district court opinion in Perry and strong language in Windsor? [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:25 pm
Perry, Howard M. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
Perry et. al. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:03 am
Perry strengthened the rights of homosexuals to marry, while avoiding the issue of whether the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution mandated every state offer homosexuals the right to marry. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
Additionally, the High Court dismissed the companion same-sex marriage case, Hollingsworth v Perry, holding that the proponents of California’s “Proposition 8,” which amended the state constitution to define marriage as a union between a man and a woman, lacked standing to appeal a federal district court’s ruling that the ballot initiative was unconstitutional. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:12 am
Perry is a disastrous decision, as conservative columnist Tamara Tabo explains. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:05 am
Perry (opinion). [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 7:05 am
Perry, dealt with California’s Proposition 8, which itself has a long legal history. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 5:19 am
Perry and then drew straws to see which five would be in the majority and which four in the dissent. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 8:48 pm
In LA or Alameda, they probably could use the Perry injunction for preclusive effect; in other counties, the couple could use it as persuasive authority. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:58 pm
Perry today, the U.S. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:41 pm
Perry (the Prop 8 case) here. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:23 pm
Perry this morning (see Marriage Equality Returns to California), California is included among those states. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:18 pm
Perry, 570 U.S. ___ (2013), this morning, regarding the validity of Proposition 8. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 5:56 pm
They are-Hollingsworth v Perry (rejecting an appeal of the lower court decision overturning California's Proposition 8, on technical jurisdictional grounds), and US v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:35 pm
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 4:32 pm
If that were not enough, the Supreme Court’s companion decision, Hollingsworth v Perry, No. 12-144, decided June 26, 2013, leaves in place a determination, under California state law, that same-sex partners could not be denied the benefits of marriage. [read post]
