Search for: "Marshall v. District of Columbia"
Results 261 - 280
of 298
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2010, 1:17 pm
————————– On the day 20 months ago that the Supreme Court decided the historic case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 1:36 pm
Clarke School of Law and former dean of the Thurgood Marshall School of Law at Texas Southern University. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:46 am
(Patent Infringement) District Court E D Texas: Defense wins JMOL at conclusion of plaintiff's case in Marshall patent trial: Southwest EFuel Network, LLC v Transaction Tracking Technologies, LLC (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas denies stays pending ex parte and inter partes reexam:Zapmedia Services, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 12:00 am
Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik v Anheuser-Busch Inc (Class 46) (IPKat) EPO: Should green technology be subject to compulsory licensing? [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 3:53 am
Last year in District of Columbia v. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 8:11 am
Furman v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:30 am
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals' decision in Wiesmueller v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:52 pm
The judge, applying NLRB v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:04 am
Alan Gura, who successfully argued the landmark Supreme Court gun case District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 12:40 am
Yesterday in Newdow v. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 1:00 pm
According to the complaint, Bailey's custodian, the District of Columbia, willingly relinquished custody upon request of the federal marshals presenting a facially valid arrest warrant. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:26 pm
All their lawsuits are filed in the Eastern District of Texas, either in Tyler, where they draw Judge Leonard Davis, or Marshall, where they draw Judge David Folsom. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
View the original article here Print this. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 11:10 pm
On June 26, 2008, the Supreme Court decided the District of Columbia v. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 11:07 pm
On June 26, 2008, the Supreme Court decided the District of Columbia v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:45 am
As the District Court for the District of Columbia put it while granting summary judgment to the government in American Forest Research Council v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 7:31 am
Bolden v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 3:28 am
However, Chief Justice Marshall famously said in McCulloch v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 5:15 am
Columbia County, 2008 U.S. [read post]
