Search for: "Matter of Abel"
Results 261 - 278
of 278
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2007, 9:22 am
For information on the broader effort to establish a right to counsel in important civil matters, see here. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 5:38 am
Of Note: As an initial matter, Cope has valuable language on the need to strictly construe terms of plea agreements against the drafter - the government. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 12:02 pm
[L]abeling that includes theoretical hazards not well-grounded in scientific evidence can cause meaningful risk information to lose its significance. [read post]
12 Sep 2007, 12:20 pm
Thus, we find no physical subject matter being transformed. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 2:50 pm
Worse still, the rationale underlying many of these rejections is based on cases that have been long overruled (In re Warmerdam, In re Schraeder, Freeman-Walter-Abele, etc.). [read post]
11 Aug 2007, 3:46 pm
If you don't know, does it matter? [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 10:53 am
Abel, 585 F.2d 613 (4th Cir. 1978) (per curiam). [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:00 am
When Cain slew Abel, the first words the Lord gave to him were "What have you done? [read post]
26 May 2007, 10:56 am
Abel, the lead Supreme Court decision that supports the broad use of bias evidence (by the government). [read post]
17 May 2007, 8:00 am
Abel, Associate Director of the Brennan Center for Justice, addresses how to insure that civil Gideon be implemented in a way that maximizes the competence and diligence of the attorneys who fulfill this role (A Right to Counsel in Civil Cases: Lessons from Gideon v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 8:33 am
If we are doomed to err in matters of life and death, it is far better to err on the side of caution. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 5:51 am
If we are doomed toerr in matters of life and death, it is far better to err on the side ofmercycaution. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 6:18 am
These events are good news for low-income people, who are often left without the legal representation they need in high stakes civil matters. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 11:55 pm
Of course, at this point, most of Ben's suggestions are purely academic, since CAFC caselaw has expressly overruled Freeman-Walter-Abele. [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 6:12 am
Abel & David Pedulla In November, the voters called for a different approach to national policy. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 7:28 am
Thanks, Simon Haslam (Abel & Imray), spotting it.This was Halliburton's appeal against the decision of Pumfrey J (here , noted by the IPKat here), that its patent for rotary cone drill bits was invalid for insufficiency. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:45 pm
" Diehr, 450 U.S. at 185.(...)After Diehr and Chakrabarty, the Freeman-Walter-Abele test has little, if any, applicability to determining the presence of statutory subject matter. [read post]
11 Oct 2006, 7:18 am
" As a second example, though Annex III of the Interim Guidelines states that the Freeman-Walter-Abele test is improper for determining eligibility under § 101, and Freeman-Walter-Abele is never mentioned by name, Freeman-Walter-Abele reasoning and case law pervades the Interim Guidelines. [read post]
