Search for: "Matter of Booker" Results 261 - 280 of 556
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2012, 10:33 am by Lindsay Griffiths
  Not all proceedings in a class action will follow the same timeline - so unfavorable rulings could happen in cursory matters before the class action. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:56 pm
It's patriotism," says Newark Mayer Cory Booker. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 7:55 am
Too many people have their cases remanded for a completely uninteresting (to anyone else) problem with a supervised release condition, or a guidelines issue that should have been completely obvious, or because Booker requires every defendant in a criminal case to receive probation (that last one is something I heard in a jail the other day - it may not be the law (though soon it won't matter because any minute now Congress will approve the 65% good time credit law)). [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:34 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
Booker, which applied Blakely to the federal sentencing guidelines. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 2:46 pm by Michael O'Hear
Booker, which applied Blakely to the federal sentencing guidelines. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:35 pm by Michael O'Hear
 (The use in risk assessment of certain well-recognized suspect categories, though, like race and national origin, might be another matter.) [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 4:46 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
 (The use in risk assessment of certain well-recognized suspect categories, though, like race and national origin, might be another matter.) [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 8:31 am by christopher
HarvardLaw74 Backup file made by TweetBackup 2012-08-02 15:24:182012-08-02 14:03:54 HarvardLaw74: RT @KeithDarce: Private financing of digital health tripled in 1st half of 2012 to $499B http://t.co/cGPJP6wI via HealthTechZone #startups [Non Social media driven Healthcare startups have the immediate opportunity to achieve solid revenues in an expanding domestic and international market] http://twitter.com/HarvardLaw74/statuses/2308613732094730262012-08-02 00:22:42 HarvardLaw74: 482 recently… [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:55 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
 The court seemed to have some misgivings about giving Dooley any relief, but was ultimately swayed by the prosecutor’s failure to press the matter: A 96-month sentence for Dooley’s despicable conduct would not adversely affect the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm by Michael O'Hear
 (As an aside, I’m pleased to see the court recognize that vague is not the same thing as useless; in a slightly different context, I’ve been disappointed post-Booker by the extent to which the courts seem not to take the §3553(a) factors seriously because of their apparent vagueness. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 12:42 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
  Here, courts might look to the large body of cases on the question of what it means, in a post-Booker world, to “consider” the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:44 pm by Michael O'Hear
  Here, courts might look to the large body of cases on the question of what it means, in a post-Booker world, to “consider” the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 4:44 am by SHG
  Let's see, Mistretta was decided in 1989, and a mere 16 years later, the Supreme Court decided Booker. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 5:07 pm
She notes that the 11th Circuit has always given deference to a sentence imposed above the guideline range no matter how large, and since Booker, the 11th Circuit has never vacated an upward variance from the sentencing guidelines on reasonableness grounds. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 3:26 am by SHG
For years, federal courts in North Carolina said that did not matter. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:44 pm by lawmrh
» Read Full Article What’s instead making headlines now isn’t the matter of those petitions. [read post]