Search for: "Matter of Dept. of Insurance's Order"
Results 261 - 280
of 434
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2022, 4:46 am
As explained in Matter of Validation Review Assocs., Inc., contractual provisions that absolutely bar a shareholder from seeking judicial dissolution are generally void as against public policy (223 AD2d 134 [2d Dept 1996]). [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
In response to her request for a pre-termination hearing, the Town advised the complainant that in order to return to work she would have to submit a report clearing her to return from the doctor who found her unfit to attend the hearing before the DHR. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
In response to her request for a pre-termination hearing, the Town advised the complainant that in order to return to work she would have to submit a report clearing her to return from the doctor who found her unfit to attend the hearing before the DHR. [read post]
15 Apr 2016, 8:10 am
No. 405 on 16 August 2006 giving DSS thirty days from the date of the decision and order to do so. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:30 am
Frankel, 978 N.Y.S.2d 135 (N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. [read post]
30 May 2008, 11:23 am
Dept. of Child Services - "Appellant Dawn B. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 5:51 am
Thus, in order to carry the insurer's burden of proof that the services were not medically necessary, the insurer's expert must show that the services provided were inconsistent with generally accepted medical/professional standards. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:34 am
” The Appellate Division modified the order. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 9:34 am
” The Appellate Division modified the order. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 2:57 am
Thus, Supreme Court's order dismissing the action must be vacated (see e.g. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:59 am
Thus, Supreme Court's order dismissing the action must be vacated (see e.g. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 2:27 pm
Francis, 286 A.D.2d 749 (2nd Dept. 2001). [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 3:08 am
Thus, Supreme Court's order dismissing the action must be vacated (see e.g. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 3:30 am
Dept. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Daniels Agency, Inc.), 118 AD2d 646 (2d Dept 1986). [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Daniels Agency, Inc.), 118 AD2d 646 (2d Dept 1986). [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 10:00 am
This is because the insurer will be "bound at least to the matters necessarily determined in the lawsuit. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 5:14 pm
Dept. of Child Svcs. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 7:55 am
These laws require permits when shooting commercial photography in order to limit the impact of photo shoots on the public and to require insurance in case someone is injured during the shoot. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:44 am
Elgood Mayo Corp., 56 NY2d 667, [1982]; see Travelers Insurance Co v Ferco, Inc., 122 AD2d 718, 719 [1st Dept 1986]). [read post]
