Search for: "Matter of English v Smith"
Results 261 - 280
of 323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
There were two pieces of prior art over which the patents were claimed to be obvious: the first was a paper referred to as Parmley & Smith, and the second was a conference paper delivered by Professor Smith (of Parmley & Smith fame) in Banbury. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:47 pm
In terms of potential impact, the case of Sorrell v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 8:42 am
R. v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:15 pm
There’s one footnote, citing four cases from three jurisdictions: Smith v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:14 pm
Lest any of you think that who bears the burden of proof doesn't really matter, take heed of the recent decision in Chow v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:41 am
In a neat parallel, the former lead singer of The Smiths has recently said he is “uneasy” about the Prime Minister being a fan of the band. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Justice Blake considered the relevant principles to be applied in relation to the PSEDs, as summarised in R(Boyejo & Ors) v Barnett LBC and Smith v Portsmouth CC [2009] EWHC (Admin) 755. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
Colonial archive v. local sites; old works v. present recordings as part of the archive; new relations of control. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 1:42 am
One aspect of this issue was covered in my post on the case of Ntuli v Donald ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276). [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:36 am
The Supreme Court’s decision this week in Aruna Shanbaug v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
It is obviously not a specifically English or UK issue. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 10:00 pm
As for the application for a declaration, this had already been made in Smith v Scott and therefore there was nothing of additional practical use which granting a declaration would serve. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm
The Early Cases Until recently the English law did not recognise any right to receive information. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm
This gap seems to be the longest in English legal history. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 8:45 am
Complaints can also be made in languages other than English. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 3:17 am
Next Week in the Courts On Monday 13 December 2010, Mr Justice Tugendhat will give judgment in the case of Smith v ADVFN Plc & ors (heard on 3 December 2010). [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 4:48 am
Noting the very high threshold for review imposed by the Wednesbury test (see criticisms of this by the House of Lords in R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Daly [2001] UKHL 26,[2001] 2 AC 532 and the Strasbourg Court in Smith and Grady v United Kingdom (1999) 29 EHRR 493, para. 138) the Committee considered that the application of a “proportionality principle” by the courts in E&W could provide an adequate standard of… [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:23 am
(A123) v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:53 am
Each week at Wise Law Blog, we review decisions from the Ontario Court of Appeal.R. v. [read post]
