Search for: "Matter of Greenfield" Results 261 - 280 of 853
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Dec 2014, 4:19 am by SHG
 To the extent anyone gives a crap, it’s begrudging (While I don’t agree with Greenfield, he’s prolific). [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 2:15 pm by Kevin
" There it now ruins the neighborhood for 29 respectable and even useful sites written by people like Eric Turkewitz, Kashmir Hill, Walter Olson, Scott Greenfield, and Jeff Richardson, and also group ventures like Above the Law, Abnormal Use, The Volokh Conspiracy, and even SCOTUSblog. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:54 am by Ron Coleman
  It is not so much a matter of “real lawyers have blogs,” but rather whether what people put online using the name are, in fact real blogs. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am by My name
           The reality of the most notorious virtual currency is that it is only a matter of time before it comes under the purview of a regulatory body. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 3:30 am by Walter Olson
Of course, but that’s a matter for Congress. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 6:42 am by Jim Sedor
A pair of lobbyists connected to the matter have already pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 5:02 am by Jeff Gamso
 (See Greenfield this morning on New York's law against gravity knives, for instance.) [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 Where the motion papers demonstrate that the defendant’s right to testify before the grand jury has not been “scrupulously protected,” the “mandatory language” of CPL § 190.50(5) “creates what is a ministerial duty on the part of the court to dismiss an indictment obtained in violation of a defendant’s right to appear before the Grand Jury” (Matter of Borrello v Balbach, 112 AD2d 1051 [2nd Dept 1985]; see also, People v Mason, 176… [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 11:24 pm by Jeff Gamso
 And he has acknowledged that, at least as a theoretical matter it's at least a possibility if we have a death penalty, which he thinks we should have. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 8:10 pm by Michael Lumer
 In essence, Greenfield is arguing that lawyers need to separate those facts that matter -- i.e., help support compelling legal arguments or dooms the case -- from the surrounding noise. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 5:39 am by SHG
Who do you think you are that you’re so special, your stories so wonderful, your insights so important, that they matter while mine do not? [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by Cordell Parvin
Experience: Experience handling a particular type of matter is important. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 5:50 am by Jim Sedor
Actor Frank Ridley plays the character of a money-hungry politician, who lets the public know in his ad that the issues do not matter, as long as he can get re-elected. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:57 am by Eric Turkewitz
  For the purposes of this matter, there are two plaintiffs and two defendants and five frivolous claims, thus subjecting the plaintiffs to as much as $200,000 in costs under CPLR 8303-a. [read post]
20 May 2014, 4:03 pm by Jeff Gamso
 Scott Greenfield ain't buying.Nobody makes it through life without someone or something offending them, no matter how tough they may be. [read post]
10 May 2014, 4:59 pm
My own experience has led me to some unsavory findings in cases involving the recently deposed Charles Hynes.Citing Greenfield, Rick Horowitz posed on his RHDefense blog, "Meh. [read post]