Search for: "Matter of Henderson"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,081
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2007, 1:31 am
The column then highlights last week's counterfeiting claims which came from CRIA's Graham Henderson and a commissioned survey from Pollara. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 1:43 am
The claimants alleged that UK legislation had contravened EU law, specifically the free movement of capital enshrined in Article 56 of the EC Treaty (now Article 63 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union), by treating dividends received from foreign companies unfavourably in comparison to those received by companies resident in the UK.The matter had been referred to the ECJ on a number of issues and returned to the High Court. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 3:16 pm
The Supreme Court in Henderson explained that the consequences of a jurisdictional interpretation are so drastic that a rule should not be labeled jurisdictional “unless it governs a court’s adjudicatory capacity, that is, its subject-matter or personal jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:16 pm
Henderson’s Questions and Answers with Problems and Illustrative Matter on the Law of Torts, Based on all the Standard Text and Case Books made of it back in 1933. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 8:13 am
Here is the amicus brief filed on behalf of Mark Cuban by professors Alan Bromberg, Allen Ferrell, Jonathan Macey, Todd Henderson and Stephen Bainbridge . [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 2:55 am
Her blog on "the relationships that matter" is always a delight. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 6:00 am
The district court granted the committee’s motion for summary judgment, holding that it had subject-matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 10:33 am
Todd Henderson (Chicago Law), has posted an interesting paper on SSRN. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 3:18 pm
In re Will of Henderson, 253 A.D. 140, 145 (1937). [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 1:03 pm
Circuit panel (Henderson, Williams, Randolph) to vacate and remand the grant of habeas relief in Hatim v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 10:36 pm
This reminder came in a recent case, Herridge and Henderson. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:00 am
A panel consisting of Judges Henderson, Srinivasan, and Wilkins (well, Henderson was not present at the time) heard argument on that issue in early April (listen here for a post-argument analysis from Steve Vladeck and me on the National Security Law Podcast). [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:28 pm
It now claims that the 11th Circuit did not decide as a matter of law that Henderson couldn’t transfer his firearms to a willing buyer; rather, the government suggests, the court looked at the particular facts and circumstances surrounding the particular process that Henderson was proposing and decided that there was too much of a risk that he was, in fact, going to be exercising control over the firearms (“constructive possession”) after… [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 10:21 am
After all, we have a publication schedule, subject matter focus, and contributor guidelines that are targeted and specific. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 6:00 am
Further, the agency charged that the employer had Henderson train his much younger replacement just prior to his own discharge. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 5:37 pm
There’s a procedure to follow if the DA’s office thinks she shouldn’t be presiding over these matters, she said. [read post]
No Court Approval Of Transfer For 'Legally-Disfavored Purpose Of Paying Outsanding Credit Card Bill'
6 Jun 2011, 9:01 pm
First, there is an interplay between the best interests standard and the fair and reasonable standard: 'The more pressing the need, the more reasonable it may be for a payee to obtain immediate cash at a steep discount rate' (Matter of 321 Henderson Receivables, L.P. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 2:34 pm
I cannot speak for Bishop Henderson, since I do not know if he was in attendance at the House of Bishops meetings in Indianapolis. [read post]
11 Sep 2021, 8:00 am
He has returned to private practice, handling primarily criminal defense and family law matters, and hopes one day to serve as a judge again. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 2:33 pm
The decision will not lead to McGahn’s testimony before the Committee any time soon, however; the court remanded other matters, including the issue of whether the court has subject matter jurisdiction, back to the three judge panel for adjudication. [read post]
