Search for: "Matter of Jonathan H."
Results 261 - 280
of 860
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2020, 11:31 am
Thus, in any case where it matters which opinion has the narrower view, the dissent's approach would have us set aside the narrower opinion's points of disagreement as dictum, and the application of Marks would fail to provide a governing rule of law. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:26 pm
[Unless President Trump is re-elected, it is not clear this will matter.] [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 11:10 am
Perhaps more importantly, that remedy, as a policy matter, is awful. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 7:35 am
This procedure should apply now and in the future, no matter who lives in this house or who controls the Senate. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:58 am
This case is one, however, in which fair use was put before a jury, but the Federal Circuit determined that judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) was warranted. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:04 pm
Jonathan Mincer was the Founding Editor-in-Chief of RegBlog, the predecessor to The Regulatory Review. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 2:11 pm
Making false claims is a very serious matter and we plan to investigate this to the fullest extent of the law. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 5:51 pm
Today, there is no principle and no norm in the judicial nominations process that either side would not violate itself and simultaneously demand the other side observe as a matter of decency and inter-branch comity. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 8:49 am
Tim Wegenast, Arpita Asha Khanna, & Gerald Schneider, The Micro-Foundations of the Resource Curse: Mineral Ownership and Local Economic Well-Being in Sub-Saharan Africa Inwook Kim, Swinging Shale: Shale Oil, the Global Oil Market, and the Geopolitics of Oil Jonathan N Markowitz, Suzie Mulesky, Benjamin A T Graham, & Christopher J Fariss, Productive Pacifists: The Rise of Production-Oriented States and Decline of Profit-Motivated Conquest Deepak Nair, Emotional Labor and the Power… [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 5:26 am
The details matter, as do transition rules. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
Jonathan Entin, David F. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 6:22 pm
That matters because AEDPA's procedural rules have bite that Brecht lacks. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 7:01 pm
In 2019, following our decision, NHTSA issued a final rule that rolled back the penalty to $5.50 on the theory that the inflation-adjustment laws do not apply to the CAFE penalty in the first place, and that even if they did, an increase would be unwarranted as a matter of economic policy. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 1:15 pm
(Update: No)–5/5/20 The Penalty-less Individual Mandate Is Severable from the Rest of the ACA No Matter How You Look at It. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
The GAO referred the matter to the inspector general of the Department of Homeland Security for further review and potential action. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:11 am
This is a close and difficult standing question, and it's particularly important as the FCC sought to use standing as a means of precluding judicial review of its efforts to leverage its authority over licenses to reach matters otherwise beyond the FCC's reach. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 7:58 am
It's almost certain that she meant to change both, but the fact of the matter is that she didn't—and that left the pre-existing order of succession in place. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 9:38 am
Sherman Professor of Law, Columbia Law School Jonathan S. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 8:36 am
(In the Washington Post, for example, Timothy H. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 1:12 pm
The First Amendment protects the right of religious institutions "to decide for themselves, free from state interference, matters of church government as well as those of faith and doctrine. [read post]
