Search for: "Matter of Kerr v Kerr"
Results 261 - 280
of 878
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
(Wilfredo Lee/Associated Press) In Florida v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 8:00 am
Given that, it’s not clear to me how much the repeal actually matters. [read post]
Case Comment: Hesham Ali (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 60 Part Two
13 Mar 2017, 2:42 am
The majority drew upon the case law of the ECtHR (Rodriguez Da Silva, Hoogkamer v Netherlands and Jeunesse v Netherlands). [read post]
Case Comment: Hesham Ali (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 60 Part One
13 Mar 2017, 2:42 am
Lord Kerr dissented save in respect of the ‘complete code’ issue in a careful and detailed exposition of the issues running to 30 pages (half of the judgment). [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:24 pm
The government cites United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:14 am
But the opening of Judge Korman’s opinion in Abidor v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 7:30 am
From that perspective, the odd part about Hernandez v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:21 am
Maybe Bikkannavar has signed a form limiting or entirely waiving his Fourth Amendment rights in the phone, which could matter under O’Connor v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:07 pm
Lots of people frame their problems as © problems; Google v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm
Goss v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:00 am
In the Matter of EV (a child) (Scotland); In the Matter of EV (a child) No.2 (Scotland), heard 12 January 2017. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 3:13 am
Not since Barnette v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:45 am
” Here’s why that matters. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 11:11 am
Talk to the experienced Tennessee overtime attorneys at Mays & Kerr. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 11:11 am
Talk to the experienced Tennessee overtime attorneys at Mays & Kerr. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 12:39 pm
The appeals court noted that the 1988 case, Department of the Navy v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 12:39 pm
The appeals court noted that the 1988 case, Department of the Navy v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 11:20 am
My concern is whether the reasoning of the case makes sense as a matter of Fourth Amendment law. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 11:55 am
Gill, 2014 WL 1331013 (E.D.N.C. 2014) (citing United States v. [read post]
