Search for: "Matter of Smith v Smith"
Results 261 - 280
of 4,652
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2014, 4:16 pm
Because SORA does not define "conviction," the court in Matter of Smith found it appropriate to look to CPL 1.20 (13), which provides that conviction includes “the entry of a plea of guilty” to an accusatory instrument, does not recognize nolo contendere pleas as was also held in People v Daiboch. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 10:34 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 8:45 pm
For example, in February 2008, we noted that the Court in People v Smith (2008 NY Slip Op 00904 [4th Dept 2008)held that [W]e agree with defendant that the court erred in calculating the expiration date of the order of protection without taking into account the jail time credit to which she is entitled (see People v Clinkscales, 35 AD3d 1266, 1267; People v Hare, 27 AD3d 1171, 1172, lv denied 6 NY3d 892, 894, 898). [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 10:29 am
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC established the law of the circuit on a nifty issue of subject matter jurisdiction in the context of arbitration. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
In the Non-Precedential decision by the Pennsylvania Superior Court in the case of Lopez v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:53 am
Plaintiffs Smith & Nephew, Inc. and John Hayhurst (collectively "S&N") had appealed the district court's decision to grant Arthrex's motion for judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:19 am
McElrath v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 2:15 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: OP 09-0609, 2010 MT 43, JEREL DRIVER, CHARLES SMITH, ALAN COMBS, ABEL GONZALES, MICHAEL HAMMOND, MARTIN SWAN, CLIFFORD DELGER, DANIEL MILES, TIMOTHY DeHARRERA, WILLIAM PIPER, RONALD HUMMEL, STEVEN WHITECLOUS, CLEVE SPANG, ZANE WYMORE, DARIN GUCKEEN, TOMMY SETH DELLAR, Petitioners, v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 6:59 am
However, the court found that none of this matters, because Smith’s appeal waiver prevents him from enforcing his rights. [read post]
9 May 2018, 6:32 am
Nordholm DA 15-0743 2018 MT 116N Criminal – Justice Court Appeal Smith v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 7:18 pm
Smith v City of Keego Harbor, 2014 WL 6632163 (ED MI 11/21/2014)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Standing [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 7:18 pm
Smith v City of Keego Harbor, 2014 WL 6632163 (ED MI 11/21/2014)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Standing [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 7:00 am
[People v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 1:01 pm
The Increasing Irrelevancy of Smith v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:24 am
This case provides some much-needed guidance on that principle.The case is Smith v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:00 am
” Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 9:26 am
U.S. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:54 am
See Union Carbide Corp. et al. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 12:15 pm
Race doesn't matter. [read post]
