Search for: "Matter of Spencer v Spencer" Results 261 - 280 of 488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2009, 2:36 am
Ben Nelson (PDF 644 KB)Letters Regarding the Location for the New Global Strike Command04/03/2009 Notice: Build America Bonds and Direct Payment Subsidy Implementation (PDF 40 KB)Released by the Internal Revenue Service04/03/2009 Opinion in the Matter of Katherine Varnum, et al. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:15 am by Ritika Singh
Hearings at Guantanamo Bay on United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm by Giles Peaker
But then came Spencer v Taylor (2013) EWCA Civ 1600. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 3:35 pm by Giles Peaker
But then came Spencer v Taylor (2013) EWCA Civ 1600. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am by MOTP
" However, Mastriani failed to provide evidence of an alternative rate that he would deem reasonable and necessary or otherwise to controvert Spencer's affidavit with controverting evidence. [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
It may betray personal information long before a Spencer warrant is sought. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am by INFORRM
The British Columbia Court of Appeal judgment in Equustek adopted this description of comity in the Canadian case of Spencer v The Queen: “Comity” in the legal sense, is neither a matter of absolute obligation, on the one hand, nor of mere courtesy and good will, upon the other. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:29 am
The plaintiffs, Dennis Peet and Jeemell Spencer, further seek to hold the City of Detroit liable for the officers' alleged constitutional violations. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:51 am by Joel R. Brandes
            In Sinnott v Sinnott, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 1901679, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:11 am
  Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] [noted by the IPKat here] established that, even if most people are not deceived, passing off can still be proved. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 5:25 pm by INFORRM
  Mr Justice Martin Spencer decided that the principles of open justice and the interests of the press overrode the claimant’s desire to keep her name out of press reporting. [read post]