Search for: "Maxwell v. Maxwell"
Results 261 - 280
of 727
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2012, 5:30 pm
Oracle v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 4:25 pm
So we have an interesting post on the importance of keeping your online passwords unguessable, as well as an entry from Max Kennerly breaking down the Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
Carswell has approximately 360 U.S. titles for this platform but only three Canadian titles (the Practitioner's Income Tax Act, the Annotated Labour Code, and the Code criminel annoté produced by Yvon Blais) as well as a number of Sweet & Maxwell titles. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 12:34 am
United States v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 11:44 am
North Carolina, 13-504; Maxwell v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 8:48 am
v=s3jcnrtGFIM&list=PLw6Zv30ieX6WKvYPjCsPUsso3OaeCKO47. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 10:28 am
This piece charts the old British Catnic/Improver test against its German counterpart, the Schneidmesser test, with some fascinating results.The Kat was also glad to spot a dissertation by a rather younger friend James Tumbridge (Gowlings) on whether the Canadian Supreme Court has anything to teach the British -- with their tiny quantity of case law on famous marks -- on a subject that will not develop much in this country until the Court of Appeal for England and Wales, armed with the ECJ's… [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 4:48 pm
Wal-Mart v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:23 am
Employees’ Retirement Plan v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 11:26 pm
: Some Further Reflections on Defending HumanityYuval Shany, The Analogy's Limit: Defending the Rights of PeoplesRichard V. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 4:28 pm
Epstein v. [read post]
20 Aug 2006, 2:03 pm
Latest ETMRThe September 2006 issue of Sweet & Maxwell's monthly European Trade Mark Reports has now been published, once again ahead of schedule (well done, Sweets). [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 11:30 am
The Court has further observed that this is "superior to Maxwell's principles in this respect" since Maxwell "does not go into any further detail and does not mention sub-categories coming under the general category of casus omissus". [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 8:45 am
See Mozes v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 2:53 pm
Maxwell. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 9:37 pm
Latest ECDRThe November 2006 issue of the European Copyright and Design Reports has now been published by Sweet & Maxwell. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 7:01 am
Title: Cavazos v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 12:24 am
Sweet & Maxwell has been swift to get its 2010 periodicals out ahead of the Christmas break. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 9:22 pm
There are also some jolly good cases from non-English-speaking countries that are published in English for the first time: * Adidas Salomon v Nike Europe (Court of the Hague), in which the three-striped juggernaut that is Adidas' atrade mark portfolio runs into a mountain that is Nike's two-striped embellishment;* F... [read post]
21 Oct 2006, 12:11 pm
They were Charles Clark and Sir Robert Megarry.Charles Clark (obituary here), himself an imaginative and innovative publisher with Sweet & Maxwell and later Penguin, was copyright adviser to the Publishers Assocation and helped bring to fruition the Copyright Licensing Agency. [read post]
