Search for: "May v. Mitchell"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,411
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2016, 1:52 am
On 25 May 2015, Warby J gave judgment in the case of Economou v De Freitas ([2016] EWHC 1218 (QB))(heard 12 May 2016). [read post]
14 May 2021, 11:12 am
Sierra Club', in which the Supreme Court has construed a key privilege in FOIA jurisprudence in such a fashion as to likely put a serious damper on the ability of requesting parties to obtain record material.By Mitchell Cohen, NY Law J., May 14, 2021 There has been a perennial tug-of-war between federal Executive Branch departments and those individuals and advocacy organizations seeking to pry records loose from them. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 6:25 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:22 pm
160-162). [77] In Mitchell v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 8:23 am
Dunne v. [read post]
2 Sep 2006, 7:36 am
See Brown v Loveman, 260 Mich App 576 (2004) and a recently decided unpublished case, Mitchell v Mitchell, Docket No. 266161 (Court of Appeals decided August 17, 2006). [read post]
22 May 2012, 4:38 am
Commey v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 1:32 pm
Copyright protection in the United States was “effectively unavailable for pornography” until the landmark decision by the Fifth Circuit in Mitchell Brothers Film Group v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 12:01 pm
Copyright © 2008, Mitchell H. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 5:16 am
Donaldson actually filed this most recent complaint back in May, but no summons issued until late August, and now Baldwin's counsel, Laura Mitchell Friedmann (from Fredrikson & Byron ("the other F&B")) has moved for a flotilla of pro hac vice motions for Chicago-based Kirkland & Ellis lawyers. [read post]
10 Apr 2021, 8:31 am
Lezmond Mitchell. [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:27 pm
Naipo v. [read post]
10 May 2009, 7:18 am
LEXIS 37729 (WD MI, May 4, 2009), a Michigan federal district judge adopted a magistrate's recommendations that a Buddhist prisoner be permitted to proceed with his 1st Amendment damage claim alleging that he was denied a vegan diet, but that his claims under RLUIPA be dismissed and his claims for declaratory and injunctive relief be dismissed as moot.In Mitchell v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 8:56 am
Hutcheson v. [read post]
23 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
The Vermont Supreme Court in Chittenden Town School Dist. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 11:38 am
Per Khorrami v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:43 am
In Smiley v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:56 pm
Mitchell, [2006] O.J. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 12:31 am
Practice point: The doctrine holds that those faced with a sudden and unexpected circumstance, not of their own making, that leaves them with little or no time for reflection or reasonably causes them to be so disturbed that they are compelled to make a quick decision without weighing alternative courses of conduct, may not be negligent if their actions are reasonable and prudent in the context of the emergency.Student note: The existence of an emergency and the reasonableness of the… [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 4:50 pm
In contrast to SMARA, the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in CBD v. [read post]
