Search for: "McCOY v. STATE"
Results 261 - 280
of 391
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2012, 2:56 am
To recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff is required to show that the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession, and that the attorney's breach of this duty caused the plaintiff to suffer actual and ascertainable damages (see Dombrowski v Bulson, 19 NY3d 347, 350; Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442; McCoy v Feinman, 99… [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:08 am
To state a cause of action for legal malpractice, the plaintiff must allege that “the defendant attorney failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession,” and that the “breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442 [2007], quoting McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d… [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 6:13 am
In Thompson v. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 3:15 am
The Department of State’s Division of Licensing Services Enforcement Unit (hereinafter the Department) then began an investigation into plaintiff’s conduct. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 9:46 am
From Magistrate Judge Mac McCoy's opinion in Johnson v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 7:46 am
., Univ. of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1492 The Role of Dissents in the Formation of Precedent 14 DUKE JOURNAL OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW & PUBLIC POLICY 285 (2019), Univ. of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper No. 1493 Allocating Authority between Lawyers and Their Clients after McCoy v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:29 am
The complaint alleges that Singer and his firm breached their duty towards their client David by failing to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by attorneys, causing plaintiff to lose his case and/or to incur damages (see McCoy v Feinman, 99 NY2d 295, 301-302 [2002]). [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
This is a journalistic account of a moot court of Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 3:13 am
Garcia v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm
McCoy, et al., 09-329. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 5:52 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Jeremiah McCoy v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:26 am
See State v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:35 pm
” McCoy v. [read post]
14 Oct 2012, 6:04 pm
Katherine McCoy, of Liskow & Lewis, reports that DOJ, for the EPA, has sought a rehearing en banc, not a panel rehearing with a suggestion of rehearing en banc, of the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit invalidating the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule in EME Homer City Generating v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:49 pm
Astrue v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
In Dunn v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 5:44 am
Rogers v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 4:28 pm
., Appellant, v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 12:30 pm
Bennett v. [read post]
