Search for: "Minus v. State"
Results 261 - 280
of 871
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2013, 7:37 am
Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), PLIVA v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 7:46 am
But this case exposes a potential flaw in the process.The case is Carver v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 7:21 am
In Collins v. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 3:00 am
Scott v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 1:29 pm
Carlton & Harris, a chiropractic office, received a fax from PDR Network offering free copies of an e−book. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 1:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:30 pm
Suitable Seating Decision Regular Rate of Pay − Meal and Rest Period Premiums and California Paid Sick Leave/2022 COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave Rounding and Meal Periods Recent Supreme Court Decision on Waiting Time Penalties and Wage Statement Violations for Failure to Pay Meal and Rest Period Premiums — Naranjo v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 10:21 am
Medtronic, which held that state law requirements are generally preempted by the MDA. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am
Texas has stated that it considers black and Latino students “under-represented” at the university, based in part on their proportions in the state population. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 4:46 am
Ct. 2653 (2011), protecting promotional communications as commercial speech; next, the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
Ge v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:10 am
If you have an unpaid air ambulance claim, you may be interested in the recent decision in Lubinski v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, 2659 (2011), and United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:12 pm
The Massachusetts Court of Appeals, in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 12:37 pm
In the case of McKinney v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:42 pm
Where a federal requirement permits a course of conduct and the state makes it obligatory, the state’s requirement is in addition to the federal requirement and thus is preempted.McMullen v. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 2:40 pm
Here is the entirety of the opinion (minus footnotes): The State of Texas appeals the district court's decision that Plaintiffs' federal Taking Clause claims against the State may proceed in federal court. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:15 pm
As the Supreme Court said in Hall v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:15 pm
As the Supreme Court said in Hall v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 9:29 am
The question the Justices confronted in Trevino v. [read post]
