Search for: "Mitchell v. U.s.*"
Results 261 - 280
of 303
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2014, 7:20 pm
For a case that produced the opposite result see Mitchell Miller, a professional corporation, dba Miller Law Group, P.C. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
Gordon College v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously evaluated a Brady… [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:31 am
” In re Marriage of Mitchell, 181 Ill. 2d 169, 174 (1998) Void orders do not need a reason to be vacated. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 4:39 pm
Raleigh Hannah Levine (Mitchell Hamline School of Law), Prof. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 6:41 am
Mitchell, 463 U.S. 206, 212 (1983) ("It is axiomatic that the United States may not be sued without its consent. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am
Assistance, 423 Mass 399 (1996), Lebow v. [read post]
18 May 2014, 11:03 am
Assistance, 423 Mass 399 (1996), Lebow v. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been… [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 3:17 am
Alvarez and Tum v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Supreme Court, January 22, 2008 Ali v. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:32 am
In a pre-Hague Convention case, the Georgia Supreme Court, in Mitchell v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
Mesa v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 9:35 am
See State v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 3:36 am
"The 16 defendants were convicted under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:13 pm
The Board affirmed the § 101 rejection under Bilski v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
New Jersey Assault Charges - NJSA 2C:12-1 § 2C:12-1. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:13 pm
Wingerter v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
In the case, Authors Guild v. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 2:26 pm
Lujan v. [read post]
