Search for: "Mobile Entertainment, Inc." Results 261 - 280 of 344
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2010, 9:49 am by Gordon Smith
Much better than any mobile telephone I have used. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Zuccarini (The Gray Blog) (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (ipwars) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) District Court E D Michigan: Gripe site prevails in domain cybersquatting case: Career Agents Network, Inc v careeragentsnetwork.biz (Ars Technica)   US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google - Google dismisses some claims and gets some attorneys’ fees: Jurin v. [read post]
6 Mar 2010, 3:52 am
Zuccarini (The Gray Blog) (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) (ipwars) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) District Court E D Michigan: Gripe site prevails in domain cybersquatting case: Career Agents Network, Inc v careeragentsnetwork.biz (Ars Technica)   US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Google - Google dismisses some claims and gets some attorneys’ fees: Jurin v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
., Inc., -- F.Supp.2d ----, 2010 WL 668515 (D. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:55 am by Andis Kaulins
Inventors: Zuckerberg; Mark (Palo Alto, CA), Sanghvi; Ruchi (Palo Alto, CA), Bosworth; Andrew (Palo Alto, CA), Cox; Chris (Palo Alto, CA), Sittig; Aaron (Palo Alto, CA), Hughes; Chris (Palo Alto, CA), Geminder; Katie (San Jose, CA), Corson; Dan (Menlo Park, CA) Assignee: Facebook, Inc. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 1:22 am
Peter DeFazio on Dec. 3, 2009 © Copyright GalleryWatch.com, Inc. (1999 - 2009), provided under license. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int’l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant’s defences and counterclaims granted in p [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
LLC v Garmin Int'l, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas: Motion for summary judgment as to patent defendant's defences and counterclaims granted in part; antitrust claims severed: Fiber Systems International v Applied Optical Systems (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas: Motion to compel denied - non-compliance with 'meet and confer' rule: Konami Digital Entertainment Co v Harmonix Music (EDTexweblog.com) BPAI used… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(Excess Copyright)   Chile The ambitious project that seeks to change the Chilean wine map (IP tango)   China Pepsico-Tianfu JV dispute over trade secrets and branding (China Hearsay) iSuppli: China’s grey mobile phone market explodes (IP Dragon)   Europe Questions referred to ECJ in Interflora v Marks and Spencer now available (IPKat) (Class 46) ECJ crystal clear ruling in border measures reference: Zino Davidoff SA v Bundesfinanzdirektion… [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 5:33 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  This scenario provided a very entertaining overview of class arbitration challenges. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 6:47 am
Apple Inc. also sells a mouse under the same sign. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) What every transactional counsel should know – consequences of missing provisions in M&A documents: Carotek v Kobayashi Ventures; Gerber Scientific International v Satisloh (Property intangible) Troll Tracker suit settles after malice bar raised: Albritton v Cisco(Patent Baristas) (IPEG)(EDTexweblog.com) (The Prior Art) (IAM)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC construes term found in specification but not in the claims: Edwards Lifesciences LLC v… [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:30 am
From a press release of Sept. 21, 09 by Article One:Article One Partners, LLC has discovered new prior art impacting the validity of two Minerva Industries, Inc. patents for mobile entertainment and communications devices. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 6:38 am
(Michael Geist) Independent game software developer’s open letter to Entertainment Software Association of Canada on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Woodrow Wilson Canadian © event: Dialogue, debate, or duet? [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
(ISinIP) CAFC grants en banc request to challenge written description requirement: Ariad v Lilly (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patent Docs) (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) Supreme Court asked to yank obviousness from the purview of juries: Medela AG v Kinetic Concepts, Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) All you need to know about Bilski in a 30 min podcast - debate between Prof M Risch and Prof J Sarnoff (IP Think Tank) (Patent Baristas)… [read post]