Search for: "Moon v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 302
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 6:00 am
Büchel and the 5Pointz Michelangelos v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 1:06 pm
See Thaler v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 11:59 am
The Genius of Shepard’s I am pretty sure that every law student in the United States still learns to use the venerable Shepard’s citation system. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2013, 6:59 pm
But none of those would apply here, at least not under the assumption that the blog host and blog contributors are all located in the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 10:32 am
Wells had no protocol, no pre-stated commitment to which years in the dataset he would use, and no pre-stated statistical analysis plan. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 1:05 am
[Source]Besides their different origins in neutron star collisions and supernovae respectively, once our solar system had formed, the way our earth and its moon were formed may have also been important: when another planet collided with an earlier form of the earth, and the resulting debris clouds reformed into the earth and moon as we know it, heavier metals tended to stick with the heavier body while the lighter ones (which don’t include precious metals) tended to… [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 3:45 am
This seemed to have been confirmed by the decision, not long afterwards, in Penguin Group (USA) Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 6:53 am
The purpose of this Convention is "to notify to other States where a launching State's space objects are located in order to prevent collision" and to make "identifiable the potentially liable launching State for damage cause by a space object. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am
It targets non-U.S. persons who are outside the United States and authorizes the government to compel certain communication service providers within the United States to assist the government in acquiring those targets’ communications. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:06 am
Moon, Senior Fellow at the Center for East Asia Policy Studies, wonders whether the release by North Korea of US citizen Jeffrey Fowle augurs a “friendlier dip [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:38 pm
http://domainnamewire.com/2010/09/09/top-100-brands-secure-co-domains-through-special-program/ * 7 Services To Find and Reserve Your Name Across The Web (2010-08-17) http://mashable.com/2010/08/17/reserve-social-media-names/ * A Mere Mortal's Guide To Patents Post-Bilski (Or Why §101 Is A Red Herring) (2010-07-09) On 06/28/10, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Bilski v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 12:23 pm
There is every reason to believe that President Biden’s nomination process will benefit by focusing on that extraordinary group for the next justice of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 3:10 pm
" The plan states that such Fed actions "should be coordinated and implemented with the appropriate regulatory agency to the fullest extent possible. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
Although the analysis focuses on the history of patent law in the United States, it develops themes that illuminate the evolution of patent regimes in Europe [In this regard, the US is the sun to Europe's moon. [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:17 am
European Legal Traditions in Early Modern Russian Criminal Law, Marianna Muravyeva, University of Helsinki (Finland) · The Reception of the French Model of the Institution of the Prosecutor on the Lands of the Duchy of Warsaw, Damian Jagusz, University of Gdańsk (Poland) · Diffusion of International Prisons Standards: The Case of The People’s Republic of China, Elisa… [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
