Search for: "More v. Johnson" Results 261 - 280 of 5,581
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2008, 4:23 pm
King put it much more pithily, "It may be true that the law cannot make a man love me, but it can keep him from lynching me, and I think that's pretty important. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 12:27 pm by Kevin Sheerin
Matter of James Johnson v Town of Amherst In this Article 78 case, petitioner sought to annul the determination of the Town of Amherst terminating his employment for failure to meet the residency requirement of the Town Code. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 3:24 pm
 To make three, you need not one, not two, but three.Read Justice Elia's complete opinion for more detail if you're unsure about the concept.Some of this advanced mathematics is moot at this point, since after the Court of Appeal issued its OSC, the Appellate Division of the Santa Cruz Superior Court got the message and stopped hearing appeals with two (instead of three) judges. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 7:00 am by Stephanie Zable
The decision followed from the Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling Johnson v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 11:30 am
——————— Subscribe to my blog (jhandel.com) for more about entertainment law and digital media law. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:52 am
  More precisely, Walker argued that (i) the text messages from Johnson’s phone “constituted inadmissible hearsay”; and (ii) the trial testimony of Walker’s accomplices, Johnson and Clark, was not sufficiently corroborated. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 8:20 am by Unreported Opinions
More than two months following the entry of final summary judgment as to all parties, […] [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 8:12 pm
This question has probably never been more pressing. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 8:58 am by Patricia Hughes
On my way to writing a post applying the UK Supreme Court’s decision on the Boris Johnson prorogation to the City of Toronto decision upholding the province’s reduction of wards, I decided to take a detour to examine the College of Midwives of British Columbia v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:17 am by Jacqueline Jones
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website] on Friday ruled [opinion, PDF] 8-1 in Johnson v. [read post]