Search for: "Motorists Mutual Insurance Company" Results 261 - 280 of 364
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2011, 7:26 pm by The Farber Law Group
"Bad faith" is describes a tort claim against an insurance company when the insurance company has not dealt fairly with the insured person. [read post]
31 May 2011, 7:30 am
Thus Simpson may have enjoyed insurance coverage under the Virginia Municipal Liability Pool, Government Employees Insurance Company (GEICO) and/or National Grange Mutual Insurance policies implicated if he simply had testified at the declaratory judgment hearing that he had left his cruiser, siren and lights on to avoid potential car accident by alerting oncoming motorists while taking the criminal into custody. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:33 pm by Chip Merlin
(pg. 12) - A company employee adjuster, independent adjuster, attorney, investigator, or other persons acting on behalf of an insurer that needs access to an insured or claimant or to the insured property that is the subject of a claim must provide at least 48 hours’ notice to the insured or claimant, public adjuster, or legal representative before scheduling a meeting with the claimant or an onsite inspection of the insured property. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:43 am by Steven M. Gursten
Second, Allstate pushes injury victims to accept quick but very low settlements. (1 - How a get-tough policy lifted Allstate’s profits – Herald Tribune, April 6, 2008) State Farm State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company is the No. 1 provider of auto insurance in the country. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:42 am by Ryan Irving
Lapalme’s insurer, Economical Mutual Insurance Company (“Economical”), was not a party to that accident, it was joined in the Minutes of Settlement. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 10:04 pm
Yes, says New York's Court of Appeals inState Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 10:04 pm by nyinjuries
  Yes, says New York’s Court of Appeals in State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 12:36 pm by Vivian Persand
Bonenberger turned to his own automobile insurance company, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, in an effort to collect underinsured motorist benefits (UIM). [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 3:21 am by Russ Bensing
  I’d thought that all insurance companies had adopted that provision, but no:  Nationwide, Grange, Motorists, and Central Mutual don’t have it. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 11:48 am by Mark S. Humphreys
On February 4, 2011, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo issued an opinion styled, Progressive County Mutual Insurance Company v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
Motorists Mutual-American Hardware Insurance Group, Columbus, Ohio (December 1998)19. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:49 am by admin
If road safety is to continue to improve in the UK, motorists and pedestrians need to form a greater mutual respect and understanding. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm by Mark S. Humphreys
At the time of the accident, McCullough was nineteen years old and his only asset was a $25,000 liability policy with State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 6:57 am
The injured Baker sued Hurst, Liberty Mutual Insurance, and her own Uninsured Motorist carrier: Allstate. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 11:44 am by Randy Barnhart
According to the Insurance Journal: The seven latest companies to bring such subrogation actions against Toyota are: American Automobile Insurance Co., Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., National Surety Corp., Ameriprise Insurance Co., IDS Property Casualty Insurance Co., Motorists Mutual Insurance Co. and American Hardware Mutual Insurance Co. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:19 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Harleysville Insurance Co. that an insurance company was required to prove prejudice relative to a late reporting to a carrier in order to support a denial of uninsured motorists benefits to its insured. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 11:19 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Harleysville Insurance Co. that an insurance company was required to prove prejudice relative to a late reporting to a carrier in order to support a denial of uninsured motorists benefits to its insured. [read post]