Search for: "Mr. Arnold"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,688
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2018, 7:31 am
"Indeed, the AmeriKat thinks it will be a challenging for a lower court to apply such a doctrine in light of the Supreme Court's dicta in Actavis (as set out above).Sufficiency, novelty/obviousness and amendment Applying the principles summarized by Arnold J in Sandvik v Kennametal [2012] RPC 23, Mr Justice Carr also rejected RN Ventures classic insufficiency attack. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 12:45 am
According to Mr Justice Arnold himself, "[t]he case raises important issues of European trade mark law", which necessitates references to the CJEU on issues relating to (i) bad faith for filing with no intention to use and (ii) IP TRANSLATOR clarity issues. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 4:57 pm
In statements made outside court Mr Grant and Ms Hames called for the Government to press on with Leveson Part Two. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 5:29 am
Arnold J kicks off CJEU references in Sky v SkyKick After five days in court and 358 paragraphs, Mr Justice Arnold has just handed down his decision in Sky v Skykick [2018] EWHC 155. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 9:02 am
Mr Justice Arnold will chair this year's theme on Intermediary Liability and Responsibility. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 3:52 am
Mr Hobbs QC considered the relevant authorities including the judgment of Arnold J in Red Bull GmbH v Sun Mark Ltd [2012] EWHC 1929 (Ch) at [130] to [138] and the EU General Court's decision in Copernicus Trademarks (Case T‑82/14) ECLI:EU:T:2016:396. [read post]
Swedish Supreme Court confirms that domain names constitute property that can be seized by the state
13 Jan 2018, 4:34 am
As regards the efficacy of the various options, it is worth recalling the assessment undertaken by Mr Justice Arnold in his decision in Cartier [here], who considered that there might be scenarios in which domain name seizure might have some value while blocking orders remain probably the most efficient measure. [read post]
9 Jan 2018, 1:46 pm
Mr. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 11:34 am
The AmeriKat's new tattoo Back in July last year right, at the end of the Court's Trinity Term, Mr Justice Arnold referred two questions to the CJEU on the SPC Regulation in Merck Sharp & Dohme v Comptroller-General of Patents [2016] EWHC 1896. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:57 am
’ Mr Justice Arnold considered that – on the basis of the case law – the lack of intention to use can be proof of bad faith. [read post]
26 Nov 2017, 11:40 pm
Beer Pong shots c/o WikipediaA recent High Court decision (Breakthrough Funding v Nearby Media [2017] EWHC 2271 ch) follows on from an interim injunction which was granted by Arnold J earlier in the year. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 3:14 am
Also on 5 December: Christmas UNION-IP event: "IP - Past, Present and Future", with notable speaker Mr Justice Colin Birss. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 2:49 am
Prof Derclaye, Mr Ohta and Mr Saunders indicated case law on communication to the public as being in need of some rethinking, with Mr Saunders also adding the introduction of a new private copying exception [s28B CDPA was repealed shortly after it was introduced, on grounds that Government had failed to provide appropriate evidence as to why there was no need of a fair compensation requirement]. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 4:54 am
Prof Derclaye, Mr Ohta and Mr Saunders indicated case law on communication to the public as being in need of some rethinking, with Mr Saunders also adding the introduction of a new private copying exception [s28B CDPA was repealed shortly after it was introduced, on grounds that Government had failed to provide appropriate evidence as to why there was no need of a fair compensation requirement]. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 6:15 pm
Author LtakLicence Creative Commons-Attribution Share Alike 3.0 unported Jane Lambert Patents Court (Mr Justice Arnold) Parainen Pearl Shipping Ltd and Others v Kristian Gerhard Jebsen Skipsrederi AS and Others [2017] EWHC 2570 (Pat) (18 Oct 2017) This was a dispute between a company that had been incorporated in the Marshall Islands and its Cypriot subsidiaries on [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 1:11 pm
According to Mr. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 6:28 am
Whilst the Court of Appeal did note that it did not feel the issues were quite as clear as they had been to the first instance judge, it did not consider there was any reason to overturn the finding of Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
18 Oct 2017, 7:27 am
Mr Justice Arnold said the case was now better, but he would resist ordering a restraining injunction. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 3:14 am
The panel includes a blockbuster line up of panelists by video and in person including Justice Yates (Federal Court of Australia), Judge Zigann (Presiding Judge of Regional Court in Munich), Mr Justice Arnold, Mr Justice Carr and Judge Jim Kleinberg (ret.) [read post]
