Search for: "Myers v. United States"
Results 261 - 280
of 566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
(quoting Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
United States, 617 F.2d 755, 765. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
United States, 617 F.2d 755, 765. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 11:36 am
In Abood v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Such racial cleansings and establishment of “sundown towns” happened across the United States. [read post]
18 May 2009, 8:00 am
United States was decided, in 1926, and ever since, various impositions on the President's removal power have been permitted. [read post]
13 May 2011, 7:16 am
According to Justice Stevens, the president acted “not merely to do justice and avenge Sept. 11,” but instead “to remove an enemy who had been trying every day to attack the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 12:18 pm
See Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
On June 26, 2015 the Supreme Court of the United States, in Obergefell v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 10:48 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 2:25 pm
The foundational case on this issue is Myers v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm
The United States is party to 51, including the North American Free Trade Agreement. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 9:11 am
In United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm
The opinion in that case, Myers v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 1:47 am
A ruling by the United States Supreme Court near the end of the savings and loan litigation, however, has reopened the door to these defenses. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
3 May 2011, 3:32 am
In Conrick v Myers, 461 US 1l38, the United States Supreme Court established a two-prong test with respect to claims of dismissal in retaliation for "whistle blowing. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 3:04 am
Myers v. [read post]
4 Apr 2008, 9:14 am
The forum was co-sponsored by the NanoBusiness Alliance, American Chemistry Council, United States Council for International Businesses, and the Synthetic Organic Chemical Manufacturers Association. [read post]
