Search for: "NAACP v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 763
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2021, 5:39 am by Matt Cooper
The Pennsylvania state defendants waived their right to file a response brief. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 10:55 am by Pamela S. Karlan
Department of Justice (where she received the Attorney General’s Award for Exceptional Service – the department’s highest award for employee performance – as part of the team responsible for implementing the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 3:00 am by NCC Staff
On November 13, 1956, the Supreme Court ruled in the case of Browder v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 1:39 pm by Renee Newman Knake
Velazquez and legal advice and advocacy as protected speech; how Citizens United intersects with NAACP v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 3:10 pm by Stina
As chief counsel for the NAACP, Marshall successfully argued his case in Brown v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 3:00 am
Katyal, Deputy Solicitor General will argue 20 minutes for the United States and Debo Adegbile of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund in New York will argue 10 minutes for the intervenor-appellees. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In addition, a second Article 78 action was commenced by the New York State United Teachers [NYSUT], the United Federation of Teachers, Local 2 [UFT], the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, New York State Conference [NAACP] and two teachers and a parent [Petitioner Proceeding 2].Supreme Court granted the amended petitions/complaints, vacated the Regulations and enjoined their implementation. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In addition, a second Article 78 action was commenced by the New York State United Teachers [NYSUT], the United Federation of Teachers, Local 2 [UFT], the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, New York State Conference [NAACP] and two teachers and a parent [Petitioner Proceeding 2].Supreme Court granted the amended petitions/complaints, vacated the Regulations and enjoined their implementation. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 4:42 am by Amy Howe
California and United States v. [read post]