Search for: "NORTHROP GRUMMAN" Results 261 - 280 of 335
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2009, 4:05 am
Northrop Grumman's survey asks whether its compensation play is aligned with the long-term creation of shareholder value. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 12:35 pm by Phil Cameron
Scaled Composites, which was bought by Northrop Grumman Corp., was cited for five workplace violations and fined $28,870 in connection with the blast that also critically injured three men.Like SpaceShipOne, its successor will be carried aloft by a special jet aircraft dubbed the WhiteKnightTwo. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 8:25 pm
Martek and Lonza vend a health supplement made "by extracting lipids from fermented microorganisms - specifically certain microalgae. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 1:21 pm
[www.freepatentsonline.com]This patent from Northrop Grumman teaches a mechanically resonant carbon nanotube transistor providing a low output impedance in comparison to other CNT designs and a high operating frequency suitable for signal processing applications. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 9:25 am
[www.freepatentsonline.com]This patent from Northrop Grumman teaches electrically or magnetically steering optical signals transmitted in nanowires. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 11:20 am
" Northrop Grumman Corp. v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 5:41 am
Northrop Grumman [Civilian] Inspector's Lies Raise AlarmsCompany officials rapidly began an internal investigation and notified the U.S. [read post]
8 May 2009, 9:51 am
Northrop Grumman Corporation agreed April 2 to settle a federal whistleblower lawsuit for $325 million, the New York Times reported. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 4:43 am
Some recent large settlements have been for $325 million against Northrop Grumman, with the plaintiff / relator receiving $48.7 million, and for $128 million against Network Appliance, with the plaintiff / relator receiving $19.2 million. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 3:27 am
Northrop Grumman Ship Systems (Sex harassment) Ø 7th Cir. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 9:10 am by Charley Moore
Whistleblowers with insider knowledge of false claims involving health care, military, and other government spending programs have brought suits under the Act for decades.As reported by the Wall Street Journal's Law Blog, April 2009 has seen two of the biggest whistleblower settlements in history:A few weeks ago, we blogged on a huge whistleblower settlement involving Northrop Grumman, one in which pocketed the plaintiff/whistleblower nearly $49 million. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 5:55 am
A few weeks ago, we blogged on a huge whistleblower settlement involving Northrop Grumman, one in which pocketed the plaintiff/whistleblower nearly $49 million. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 10:59 pm
And a plaintiff "whistleblower" walks away with $48.7 million.... [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 7:34 pm
Last Thursday, and after seven years, an engineer formerly employed by Northrop Grumman Corp. was rewarded for his whistleblowing. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 6:00 am
Irv Terrell cuts down the nets for a second time; a Kentucky plaintiffs lawyer is convicted of fen-phen fraud; and Northrop Grumman will swap $325 million settlements with the Justice Department. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 4:21 am
In the largest qui tam settlement ever paid by a defense contractor, Northrop Grumman has agreed to pay $325 million to resolve allegations that its predecessor TRW Inc. violated the federal False Claims Act.The suit, originally filed by whistleblower Robert Ferro, alleged that the company provided and billed the government for defective parts that were integrated into satellites used by the National Reconnaisance Office.The qui tam lawsuit said that a government satellite… [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 6:25 am
Northrop Grumman didn’t admit any wrongdoing, partly, it seems, because the allegations all relate to events that occurred before Northrop closed its $6.7 billion acquisition of TRW in December 2002. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 8:08 am
Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals decides that a jury need not be bothered with a sexual harassment case because, after all, the supervisor only groped the the plaintiff once. [read post]