Search for: "NORTHWEST REQUIREMENTS UTILITIES"
Results 261 - 280
of 280
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2009, 10:31 am
The Court accepted for review an appeal in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 10:30 pm
(in support of petitioner) __________________ Docket: 08-322 Title: Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 10:05 pm
In a reply brief filed in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 4:33 am
Bureau of Reclamation already has the ability to stop water deliveries to the affected districts to satisfy requirements of the Endangered Species Act. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 12:35 am
The new appeal by the Northwest Austin utility unit offered the Court a chance to avoid addressing the constitutionality of the Section 5 extension. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 2:32 am
This requirement is in addition to the ESA section 7 requirement that Federal agencies ensure their actions do not jeopardize the continued existence of listed species. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
An appeal is expected to be filed at the Court this week in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 8:26 pm
Shortly after Section 5 was reauthorized in 2006, its constitutionality was challenged in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 1:04 am
The lawsuit in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:35 am
(If you're interested in the arguments about the 2006 extension of section 5, there's lots of good scholarship out there, plus a masterful opinion from the D.D.C. last week in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 12:08 am
In an interesting opinion issued on Friday, a special three-judge panel turned aside the challenges of the Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District to the "preclearance" requirements of Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
30 May 2008, 12:28 pm
One of the most eagerly awaited voting rights rulngs in years, the decision came in the case of Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 11:00 am
: (Patent Docs), US: Supreme Court declines to hear final Nucleonics’ appeal in gene-silencing patent dispute with Benitec Australia: (IP Law360), (Therapeutics Daily), US: 505(b)(2) drug approvals rock - Interaction of patents and exclusivity of drugs approved by FDA under section 505(b)(2): (Patent Baristas), US: StemCells’ patents survive reexam – StemCells and Neuralstem differ on extent of changes: (Patent Docs), US: StemCells announces issuance of… [read post]
9 Dec 2007, 4:00 pm
Nathaniel Persily's article, The Promise and Pitfalls of the New Voting Rights Act, recently became a focus of attention in a pending case challenging section 5 of the VRA on constitutional grounds, Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 (NAMUDNO) v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:31 pm
Cir. 1997) and Northwest Tissue Center v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 2:22 pm
It has been estimated that could cost the utility up to $600 million. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 11:43 am
Hence, the relevant standard of review would be the requirement of process due care established by Van Gorkom. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
The nature of empirical claims, however, requires that consumers of this work bring a healthy dose of skepticism to any of these projects. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 4:22 pm
To stimulate development of other resources, the bill would limit the amount of the requirement that can be satisfied by hydroelectric generation, on which the Pacific Northwest already heavily relies. [read post]
2 Dec 2006, 1:35 pm
Georgia state law requires the sign devise to be utilized in order to help prevent tragic accidents just like this. [read post]
