Search for: "NOVAK V. NOVAK"
Results 261 - 280
of 288
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2008, 6:16 am
Novak v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 7:17 am
Below you will find the UCP affiliates for Ohio: UCP of Greater Cleveland 10011 Euclid Avenue Cleveland, OH 44106 Phone: (216) 791-8363 Fax: (216) 721-3372 E-mail: sdean@ucpcleveland.org Web: http://www.ucpcleveland.org UCP of Cincinnati 3601 Victory Parkway Cincinnati, OH 45229 Phone: (513) 221-4606 Fax: (513) 872-5262 E-mail: ucpcrend@one.net Web: http://www.ucp-cincinnati.org UCP of Central Ohio 440 Industrial Mile Road Columbus, OH 43228-2411 Phone: (614) 279-0109; (800) 670-9146 (Toll Free)… [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:35 am
In Novak v. [read post]
10 Oct 2007, 9:02 pm
Novak v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 8:14 am
Novak that Professor Bainbridge is otherwise fond of his work. [read post]
4 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
In Novak v. [read post]
30 Sep 2007, 6:29 am
Harbison v. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 4:32 pm
Among them was the characterization of pornography by Supreme Court justice Potter Stewart (pictured): “I know it when I see it” (Jacobellis v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 5:34 pm
., N.A. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 3:00 am
The Appellate Division, First Department in Marso v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 9:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 2:04 pm
Novak, 66 Fed. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 1:07 pm
And, CAAFlog reports on what happens in the 10th Circuit in Ackerman v. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 9:59 am
An interesting medical malpractice action from the First Department last week - Marso v Novak, 2007 NY Slip Op 06170 - answers this problem. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:03 am
Novak, the effort to snooker an entire nation into war would unravel and this would show . . . who knows? [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
Essentially Craig v. [read post]
26 May 2007, 4:23 pm
These include * Maynards Confectionery BV v Nestle (Irish Patents Office) - the battle between CARAMAC and CARAMBAR for the hearts and souls of the sweet-toothed Irish;* Beckwith-Moore v Novak - the first decision from the ADR.eu Centre in the Czech Republic, concerning a bizarre attempt to unseat a domain name based on a thoroughly spurious set of earlier registered trade mark and design rights;* Trilux Trade Mark, a ruling of the Polish Supreme Administrative Court on… [read post]
26 May 2007, 6:21 am
Novak, 2007 WL 1501095 (Tex. [read post]
26 May 2007, 6:18 am
Novak, 2007Wl 1501095 (Tex. [read post]
