Search for: "Norris v. Norris"
Results 261 - 280
of 504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
The recent judgment of the Supreme Court in R v Jogee; Ruddock v The Queen (Jamaica) [2016] UKSC 8 was remarkable not only in that it overruled more than thirty years of case law, but also in that it concerned a controversial area of criminal law about which there was a great deal of public interest. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
Oregon v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 7:19 am
Norris, 16 U.S.C.M.A. 574, 37 C.M.R. 194 (to be admissible, must be verbatim); United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 12:01 pm
Lake v. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 9:24 am
Jacobs v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:57 am
" Norris v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 5:36 am
However, I welcome Senator Norris’s initiative as it is helpful to debate the issue. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 8:19 am
In Norris v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am
“The plaintiff commenced this action, inter alia, to recover damages for legal malpractice against the defendants Kaufman & Kahn, LLP (hereinafter Kaufman), and Fiden & Norris, LLP (hereinafter Fiden; hereinafter together the defendants), firms that represented the plaintiff’s adversaries in a prior action. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 12:25 pm
Norris, 2010 U.S. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:01 am
Norris v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 7:46 am
At Time, Adam Cohen takes a look at Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
6 May 2012, 9:00 pm
In Servier v Apotex [2012] EWCA Civ 593 the EWCA held that comity requires that English courts should not reward a litigant for acts that infringe foreign patents. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
Mr Justice Norris held the following: the directors had honestly believed that, at the time when the acquisition of the land was completed, it was in the company's best interests to go through with the transaction. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm
I've now had a chance to review the oral argument in the Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 8:59 pm
In a decision dated September 11, 2009, available on Westlaw but lamentably not on the free Web, in a habeas corpus case called Norris v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 12:35 pm
This decision was made in the shadow of Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:43 am
Judge Norris used the parenthetical in a unanimous, unpublished opinion for a panel of the Sixth Circuit consisting of himself, Judge Moore, and Judge Stranch in United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:32 am
District Judge Purdy noted, Very powerful observations do come from Lord Phillips, PSC in Norris v USA [2010] UKSC 9 (@ para 67) … His Lordship said “extradition proceedings should not become the occasion for a debate about the most convenient forum for criminal proceedings…Unless the judge reaches the conclusion that the scales are finely balanced he should not enter into any enquiry as to the possibility of prosecution in this country. [read post]
