Search for: "Ohio v. Kentucky"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,029
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2020, 6:05 am
In Smith v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:46 am
Stein v. hhgregg, Inc. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:46 am
Stein v. hhgregg, Inc. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:46 am
Stein v. hhgregg, Inc. [read post]
23 May 2019, 12:00 pm
I’m worried about the future of Roe v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:57 am
Hylko v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 3:57 am
Hylko v. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 4:20 pm
Now, from the Kentucky AG's friend-of-the-court brief for the Commonwealth in Maryville Baptist Church, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 8:30 am
Court of Appeals observed in Kennedy v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:30 am
I mentioned a couple of weeks ago that the Ohio Supreme Court still hasn’t come down with its decision in State v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Flowers Western District of Kentucky at LouisvilleCLAY, Circuit Judge. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 8:00 pm
(See, e.g., Germain, 756 F.3d at pp. 941-954 [construing the laws of Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Nebraska, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Texas, Washington, and West Virginia]; Phelps v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:14 am
In EEOC v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 11:22 am
Ohio and the plaintiffs soon should (might?) [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 3:45 am
This week, the class action bar and legal blogs have been abuzz with the news that famed plaintiffs' lawyer Stanley Chesley has been disbarred by the Kentucky Supreme Court, a development that will likely lead to his disbarment in his home state of Ohio as well. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 10:00 am
LEXIS 181896 (SD OH, Dec. 13, 2016), an Ohio federal district court adopted a magistrate's recommendation (2016 U.S. [read post]
29 May 2013, 12:46 pm
The Sixth Circuit (which covers Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee, and Michigan), held that the shareholders did not have to allege that the defendant executives knew that statements were false at the time they were made. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 7:26 am
V. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:48 am
David V. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:59 am
In the recent policy announcement, EPA stated that, due to Summit, the agency “may no longer consider interrelatedness in determining adjacency when making source determination decisions in its title V or NSR permitting decisions in areas under the jurisdiction of the 6th Circuit; i.e., Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee and Kentucky. [read post]
