Search for: "Olson v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2025, 3:30 am by John Jenkins
Olson (“Article II, § 1, cl. 1, of the Constitution provides: “The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States”. . . [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
However, a number of jurisdictions in the United States do forbid that kind of discrimination. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 3:43 am by Russ Bensing
Since immigrating to the United States in 1991, Plaintiff has sued over twenty business entities for alleged accessibility violations, and, in all (but one) of those cases, he never returned to the establishment he sued after settling the case and obtaining a cash payment. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
  The traditional understanding is that the core of the Solicitor General’s responsibility is, in the words of former SG Seth Waxman, “to ascertain and represent the interests of the United States in litigation. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am by Marty Lederman
  The traditional understanding is that the core of the Solicitor General’s responsibility is, in the words of former SG Seth Waxman, “to ascertain and represent the interests of the United States in litigation. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 12:58 pm
The United States Trustee's Office for the Northern District of Mississippi moved to transfer the cases. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:54 am by Brad Kuhn
For those of you interested in hearing from eminent domain experts across the United States on hot topic condemnation issues, I hope you’ll join us at the ALI-CLE’s 32nd Annual Eminent domain and Land Valuation Litigation Program. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 6:02 am by SHG
It was a second marriage for both Donna Lou Young and Henry V. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:15 pm
  The appeal to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“District Court”) then followed. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 9:30 am by Anna Christensen
”  And, in response to comments made by Ted Olson, who argued the case on behalf of Citizens United, following the decision, Jesse Strauss has a piece in the Huffington Post in which he discusses whether shareholders can realistically use corporate democracy to keep corporate campaign spending in check. [read post]