Search for: "Oxley, in Re"
Results 261 - 280
of 475
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Oct 2010, 2:49 pm
The Sec-retary is authorized to publish in the Federal Reg-ister standards or methods for such certification, re-quire specific recordkeeping practices with respect tosuch certifications, and audit the records thereof atany time, this authority shall not be construed todiminish or qualify any other penalty provided bythis section.Attorney Chuck Kuck and I have recently concluded that such measures are inevitable, in our article, “The Case for the Inevitable: National Compliance… [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 7:32 am
While those were pending, he later filed a claim for retaliation with the Department of Labor for compensation under Sarbanes-Oxley, which was outside of the 180-day window of his discovery of the retaliation. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 4:56 am
The SEC and Congress should re-examine these laws and ease up a bit to help keep our entrepreneurial culture going strong. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 6:50 am
So, OK, now you're thinking: "What? [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 1:08 pm
In re Workflow Management, Inc. - Proposed Joint Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Plan of Reorganization[By: Randall Reese netDockets.com |In: Bankruptcy]4. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 1:40 pm
Filed under: corporate governance, sarbanes-oxley [read post]
12 May 2010, 4:29 am
The Reasons for Last Week's 1000-Point Plunge: Maybe We're Better Off Not Knowing? [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm
Imputation involves concluding what the parties would have intended, whereas inference involves concluding what they did intend.A quick re-cap of the facts. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 6:28 pm
It requires all board directors to face re-election annually. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:00 am
In this, you’re not alone. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 4:26 am
In re MBIA Inc. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:28 pm
If you’re looking to squander serious cash at long odds, you’ve come to the right place. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 5:57 pm
And the question of whether or not you're going to impute that to the corporation and take down the corporation as well as largely a discretionary call by prosecutors. [read post]
7 May 2012, 10:53 am
" If it won't, tell your firm that you're going to save them money by spending its resources elsewhere. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 7:35 pm
They're two very different businesses. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 9:00 pm
In other words, you're not really broadening the base. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:12 am
Re-emphasize the importance of reporting improper activity through channels, including the company’s obligations under FAR 52. 203-13. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:45 am
" and "Where in the Dodd-Frank do you think you're going? [read post]
13 May 2008, 4:15 am
If you're a member of the site, input your email address on the blog to get new entries pushed out to you. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 4:35 pm
Section 1512 is part of the Sarbanes-Oxley act, passed in the wake of the Enron scandal. [read post]
