Search for: "Oxley, in Re"
Results 261 - 280
of 475
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2010, 5:45 am
" and "Where in the Dodd-Frank do you think you're going? [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 11:34 pm
Justice Sotomayor is a strong presence at oral argument, like Justices Scalia and Breyer.One final statistic of note, especially to those of us who practice primarily in the Ninth Circuit: we're no longer the black sheep of the federal courts. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 4:56 pm
Department of Labor 2000 Constitution Ave., N.W., N5404 Washington, D.C. 20210 Re: Johnson v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 7:59 am
But by focusing narrowly on the many symptoms of regulatory dysfunction it may well prevent the re-occurrence of those events and circumstances that led up to the 2008 collapse. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:54 pm
These scandals ultimately led to the adoption in 2002 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and that is when the new era of corporate governance has begun. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 2:28 pm
Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Sentencing Commission increased the offense levels for fraud, even though it had just revised offense levels to reflect the seriousness of harm caused by fraud. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm
I'm a bit surprised that almost every Republican will be going into their re-election campaigns indicating that they voted against reform, but I suppose I'll leave the political implications to others. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 4:50 pm
If you’re interested in making that inhouse move, Jumping In(House) has all the insider information. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:00 am
In this, you’re not alone. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:20 pm
What -- what -- give us an example of a case where they perhaps didn't go as far as they could have.NEOMI RAO: Well, I think the -- the Sarbanes-Oxley accounting board case is one such case. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:05 am
Harris) and Sarbanes-Oxley (FEF v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 7:21 am
http://tinyurl.com/2etxxcj Automated Review in Electronic Discovery Re-Visited - http://tinyurl.com/2fb8ccg Desktop Collection 2.0 –Enterprise Forensics Part 2 - http://tinyurl.com/284rcad Divorce Lawyers: Facebook Tops in Online Evidence - http://tinyurl.com/25x6w8n EC gives UK Two Months to Up Data Protection Laws - http://tinyurl.com/2dsrw42 eDiscovery and Rule 30(b)(6): You Only Get What You Ask For (So Know Your Borders) - http://tinyurl.com/2a2upy6 Examining The Need For… [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 11:22 am
Apart from requiring that PCAOB members could be removed by the Securities and Exchange Commission “at will” rather than “for cause”, the Court did not require any significant changes in the operation of the PCAOB.All is well also on the flip side.The 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley act is also safe.Opposers to the act, who were hoping that this case might shut down the legislation, or at minimum, force Congress to re-examine its foundation and lessen its… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm
Now we're halfway in between. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 4:03 pm
So, we're working to rewrite our ordinance in a reasonable and responsible way to protect Second Amendment rights, protect Chicagoans from gun violence.GWEN IFILL: The justices also ruled 5-4 in a case born of the Enron scandal, striking down part of the Sarbanes-Oxley anti-fraud law enacted after the company's collapse.By that same margin, they also said a California law school doesn't have to recognize a Christian group that bans gay members. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:43 am
In a 5-4 vote, the justices said that the Sarbanes-Oxley law enacted in 2002 violates the Constitution's separation of powers mandate. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 5:58 pm
Pittman, re-published on Ethics.org, explained how Sarbanes-Oxley broadly expanded the scope of unacceptable corporate behavior under securities laws: Of the five elements of the Commission's code, the only one that is specific to public companies relates to accuracy and timeliness of disclosure in public filings and other public communications. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
Whether the PCAOB is or isn’t declared unconstitutional, there are some key gaps in the original Sarbanes-Oxley legislation that should be addressed. [read post]
31 May 2010, 10:38 am
It also deals specifically with joint interests, where Oxley didn't. [read post]
31 May 2010, 10:38 am
It also deals specifically with joint interests, where Oxley didn't. [read post]
