Search for: "Oxley v. Oxley"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2016, 12:47 pm
PHH v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 9:00 am
For example, in a recent decision (Erhart v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 4:42 pm
Securities & Exchange Commission v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 6:35 am
The case was dismissed on a motion for summary judgment in the district court, but the Second Circuit reinstates the claim.The case is Sharkey v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 6:16 am
SEC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 4:09 pm
In Securities & Exchange Commission v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:02 am
[On August 31, 2016], the Ninth Circuit issued an opinion in SEC v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 7:56 am
The CEO's own certifications of the company's disclosures demonstrated that he did not subjectively believe there was fraud at the company (Verfuerth v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm
Thus Robin Oxley of the Vote Leave campaign was prompted to opine that Juncker’s alleged remarks were ‘crass and an insult to the sacrifice those cemeteries represent’, a reading which it is quite simply impossible to square with what he actually said. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 11:10 pm
In Wagner v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 11:02 pm
The ARB’s decision was issued in Dietz v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 pm
John Reed Stark As I noted in a recent post, on June 8, 2016, the SEC, in what one commentator called “the most significant SEC cybersecurity-related action to date,” announced that Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC had agreed to pay a $1 million penalty to settle charges that as a result of its alleged failure to adopt written policies and procedures reasonably designed to protect customer data, some customer information was hacked and offered for sale online. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 8:27 am
Parexel Int’l LLC for determining whether a Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower’s belief is objectively reasonable (Beacom v. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:12 pm
Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in American Pipe and Construction Co. v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:34 am
” Public companies also face additional rules, notably those imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley of 2012 and the Dodd-Frank Act. [read post]
26 May 2016, 7:20 am
Judge Agee dissented (Deltek, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 6:00 am
Dietz v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 2:33 pm
Laphen agreed to pay a $750,000 penalty and return to CSC more than $3.7 million under the clawback provision of Sarbanes-Oxley. [read post]
9 May 2016, 6:06 am
Megan Messina, Plaintiff, v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 3:18 pm
He failed on each count.Sarbanes-Oxley Act. [read post]
