Search for: "P. v. Murray" Results 261 - 280 of 320
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2010, 5:29 pm by INFORRM
   There is, surprisingly, no mention of the leading English case on privacy and street photographs: Murray v Express Newspapers ([2008] EWCA Civ 446). [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 12:35 pm by Nicole Mazzocco
In Slager v Kid’s Kourt, LLC, No 292856, the Court of Appeals held that where a defendant is the factual and proximate cause of an injury, a subsequent tortfeasor that is not part of the causal chain may not be held liable for the injury under Michigan’s comparative-fault statutes. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 5:10 am by Fiona de Londras
(p. 43) The question of jurisdiction is not, in fact, as clear as this quote suggests and I have looked at the matter in some detail here. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 4:39 am by Stephen Page
The court reaffirmed the principles of when a lawyer might be required to pay costs:In Cassidy v Murray the Full Court also set out the principles relevant to the exercise of the jurisdiction to award costs against a lawyer under the Act. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 882 P.2d 298, 308-09 (Cal. 1994); Barker v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 7:50 am by INFORRM
Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments in media cases remain outstanding: Imerman v Tchenguiz (and linked appeals), heard 10 to 11 May 2010 (Master of the Rolls, Moses and Munby LJJ) British Broadcasting Corporation v Sugar, heard 17 May 2010 (Master of the Rolls, Moses and Munby LJJ) Khader v Aziz and Davenport Lyons, heard 19 May 2010 (Sir Anthony May P, Carnwath and Moore-Bick  LJJ) Flood v Times Newspapers Limited,… [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:02 pm by JT
Co. v United Diagnostic Imaging, P.C., 2010 NY Slip Op 03944 (2d Dept. 2010) “The test for ordering disclosure to aid in arbitration is “necessity,” as opposed to “convenience” (Hendler & Murray v Lambert, 147 AD2d 442, 443 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 10:06 am by JT
Matter of Fortunato v Murray, 2010 NY Slip Op 03122 (2d Dept. 2010) “Contrary to the Family Court’s general statement of the applicable law, “[a] physician’s office records, supported by the statutory foundations set forth in CPLR 4518(a), are admissible in evidence as business records. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:35 am by Broc Romanek
And I'm just loving the satirical campaign being waged by Murray Hill Inc. [read post]