Search for: "P. v. Thomas" Results 261 - 280 of 2,779
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
ORDERED that the order is modified insofar as appealed from, on the law, by deleting the provisions thereof, in effect, denying those branches of the motion of the defendants New York City Transit Authority, Thomas P. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:33 pm by Ilya Somin
UPDATE 2: Robert Thomas offers a more critical view of the court's ruling at the Inverse Condemnation blog. [read post]
30 May 2022, 9:00 pm by Samuel Estreicher and Troy Kessler
Under Title VII, protected religious beliefs are not dependent on whether they are “acceptable, logical, consistent, or comprehensible to others,” Thomas v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm by David Kopel
However, originalist approaches the Coinage Clause and the N&P Clause just validate the long-standing status quo. [read post]
19 May 2022, 4:45 am by Miquel Montañá (Clifford Chance)
Our last blog entry, UPC: four reasons on why the PPA is not legally in force, published on 21 April 2022, seems to have touched a nerve, as attested by the unprecedented number of comments received, for which this author is very grateful. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
On Friday 29 April 2022 there was a hearing in the case of Vardy v Rooney. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Here I'll say a word about three odd-numbered amendments, which I'll take in reverse order.Eleventh Amendment: By its terms, the Eleventh Amendment bars suits "against one of the United States by citizens of another state," but in 1890 in Hans v. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 5:36 pm
I am delighted to share the video recording of the  event recently sponsored by the Penn State Law Federalist Society: "Natural Law and the US Constitutional Order" which was held at Penn State law 12 April 2022. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 8:50 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of British Columbia wrestled with this very issue in a recent decision in Thomas and Saik’uz First Nation v Rio Tinto Alcan Inc. [read post]