Search for: "PARENTING OF A L S" Results 261 - 280 of 4,561
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2013, 7:16 am by hjmarcus
Statute of Limitations: -reduce the current S/L from 2 years to 1 year, except in tuition reimbursement cases in which case it would be 6 months from "from the placement by the parent or person in parental relation in the private school, provided that the student shall be deemed placed for such purpose on the first day the student is enrolled in and is liable for tuition in the private school." 6. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 8:30 am by Liisa Speaker
Facts:            The trial court found that grounds for terminating respondents’ parental rights were established under MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i), (c)(ii), (g), (j), and (l). [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 11:10 am
Michelle Shamblin's article, Silencing Chicken Little: Options for School Districts after "Parents Involved," 69 La. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 5:10 am
Nebraska Supreme Court finds personal jurisdiction proper for child's action against divorced parent who travelled to Nebraska and had his relatives do the same to take her to Canada where the parent allegedly abused the child. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:09 am
   Research suggests that a child's secret wish is for their parent's to reconcile - in this case the biological parents did have a marriage of convenience. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 5:01 am
Grant, 40, was senior vice president for operations at AOL's parent, Time Warner. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 10:30 am by admin
Likewise, a stepparent can petition for a stepchild as long as the stepparent married the child’s natural parent before the child’s 18th birthday. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 8:15 am
L. from her daughter since there’s been no evidence, or even accusation, of abuse or neglect. [read post]
12 May 2008, 11:36 am
For publication opinions today (0): NFP civil opinions today (1): Term. of Parent-Child Rel. of S.F. and D.L., and Sherry F., David F., and David L. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 6:23 am by Liisa Speaker
 The Court of Appeals reversed on several grounds; however, two are of note:Termination due to prior termination violates due process:Clear and convincing evidence was presented to support termination of the father’s parental rights under subsection (l), which requires only that a respondent’s parental rights to one or more of the child’s siblings have been terminated pursuant to statute. [read post]