Search for: "PARKER PETIT"
Results 261 - 280
of 467
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2012, 7:49 am
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit in Parker v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:07 am
Parker v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:18 am
Parker, a partner at Venable LLP in Baltimore, Maryland. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Reply of petitioners Parker v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm
Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionReply of petitioners Howes v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 4:36 am
” In re Estate of Parker, supra. [read post]
31 May 2012, 3:12 pm
[name withheld] says there was no such assault, he wasn’t adjudicated for it, never pled to it, but hasn’t had the money to petition to have it removed. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:43 pm
Dukes involving the standard for class-action certification, and a fourth time in Parker v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
Washington, that prejudice requires a showing that, but for counsel’s error, there is a reasonable probability of a different outcome.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (6th Cir.)Petition for certiorari Brief in oppositionReply of petitioner Parker v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 4:00 pm
Johnson, 11-1053, a state-on-top habeas case out of the Third Circuit; Parker, Warden v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:55 am
Second, Parker, Warden v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:19 pm
As a matter of fact, some groups have gone as far as petitioning that automakers make these kinds of devices disabled while the vehicle is in drive. [read post]
3 May 2012, 4:19 pm
As a matter of fact, some groups have gone as far as petitioning that automakers make these kinds of devices disabled while the vehicle is in drive. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:15 am
In 1974, the Court said in Parker v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:50 pm
Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Parker, Warden v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 9:09 am
Petition Granted Nelda Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:46 pm
If you need sophisticated legal advice, contact Parker Scheer Lagomarsino, immediately. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 6:40 am
The district court said no and the Second Circuit (Wesley, Parker and McLaughlin) also says no.If you are a Rule 60(b) junkie, then read the decision for a good summary of what that rule means and why portions of it are mutually exclusive. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:07 pm
The case against Range arises out of complaints by the owners of two water wells in Parker County, Texas, which is in the Dallas/Fort Worth area. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 2:13 pm
Parker, 348 U.S. 26, 33 (1954). [read post]
