Search for: "PEOPLE v. JACOBS"
Results 261 - 280
of 694
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2014, 5:11 am
Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] [noted by the IPKat here] established that, even if most people are not deceived, passing off can still be proved. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 5:29 pm
Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
This claim is, of course, deeply counterintuitive, and it would be very awkward, to say the least, for the Supreme Court to explain to the American people that Section 3 doesn’t apply to someone who’s been President because although that person held an “office,” it wasn’t an office “of the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:33 am
And that assumption is necessary to defend INS v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 2:32 pm
Police are supposed to good reason to arrest people. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 1:02 pm
Jacobs said it is not uncommon for Border Patrol to look for people as part of an immigration sting by looking for their cars. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(579) Yet, as Fulton v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm
Just as Roe v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 5:35 am
Texas, which effectively made all gay people criminals in the eyes of the law. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection The ICO published its annual tracking research showing that 77% of people say protecting their personal information is essential. [read post]
[David Kopel] Restoring the right to bear arms, New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen
9 Aug 2022, 9:19 am
States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
” The Washington Post reports that in the wake of District of Columbia v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:54 am
AskSir Robin Jacob ...Swearing in. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 10:52 pm
Baltimore and Livingston v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Tyne v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:33 pm
Mnuchin will do right by the American people and honest taxpayers. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Jacobs ISBN: 9780774863575 Publisher: UBC Press Page Count: 368 Publication Date: September 1, 2020 Regular Price: $89.95 (Hardcover) Excerpt: from the Introduction: “Taking Meaningful Access to Justice in Canada Seriously” [Citations omitted] Access to justice has long been recognized as among the most basic rights of democratic citizenship but also one of the least well understood in terms of its realization. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:16 pm
In a welcome judicial recognition of the problem, the Second Circuit has ruled in Dolphy v. [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 5:11 am
The first is by Jacob Sullum at Reason. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
At para.15 of his judgment Sedley LJ quotes him:"In Vodafone v Orange [1997] FSR 34 Jacob J, invited by consent to find the single meaning of words sued on for malicious falsehood, said:"As a comparative stranger to this branch of the law I find the "one meaning rule" strange, particularly for malicious falsehood. [read post]
