Search for: "PETER DOE"
Results 261 - 280
of 10,046
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2023, 5:07 am
" That piece, by Peter Wehner, carries the sub-headline: "He is becoming frighteningly clear about what he wants. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:08 am
But if the museum does not change its policies, public opinion may go against the museum, especially in a time where there is a global push for repatriation. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:15 am
Peter Maher and Patricia Hoyt Maher, 100 USPQ2d 1018 (TTAB 2011). [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 1:05 pm
This was just Dastar: “Design Gaps does not allege that the kitchens and cabinets cited in the Amended Complaint were actually sold in commerce by anyone other than the Peters Defendants. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am
By Barbie Kim Philip de Montebello is the Fiske Kimball Professor in the History and Culture of Museums at the Institute of Fine Arts, New York University. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:08 am
This does not seem to be the case, as also noted by Martin Husovec in one of his latest editorials. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 4:55 am
Quick links Peter Edge, Edgelawblog: The Isle of Man Constitution Bill 2023 Neil Foster, Law and Religion Australia: New NSW “Religious Vilification” law: on an amendment to the New South Wales Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 making certain types of speech connected with religion unlawful which came into effect on 11 November 2023. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 7:04 am
Peters v. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 1:42 am
Ultimately, the Court has ruled that S. 3(d) does apply to biochemical substances but that the Explanation to S. 3(d) does not apply to the claimed invention and that Novozymes appeal should be allowed in part. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
The Federal Trade Commission has accused Amazon of illegally maintaining its monopoly, extracting supra-competitive fees on merchants that use Amazon’s platform. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:23 am
Matter of Peters, Matter of Peters, 34 A.D.3d 29 (Supreme Court New York, 2006). [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 1:24 am
This obviously does not mean that China is not committed to patent protection. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
Contact Peter A. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
Contact Peter A. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 3:03 pm
This article does not serve as a substitute for legal advice tailored to a particular situation. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 6:14 am
On 3/30/23, the judgment was still on the judgment roll in the County Clerk’s office as against all original judgment debtors, with a notation “default judgment does not apply to Benjamin Carlisle. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
Researching whether the persons responsible for Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment thought the president was an officer of the United States is a bit like researching whether George Washington had five fingers on his right hand. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
It does seem that the process of anonymisation has been holding up timely publication, and hopefully this will improve as the UPC becomes more familiar with and streamlines the process. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 12:23 am
In any case, the proposed Directive does not provide the required clarification on the scope of activities covered, e.g., the unclear limitation as to “when a reference medicinal product is used” in the preamble, the use of the optional word “may” under point (b) that can lead to diverging implementation by the Member States and the fact that the regulation makes reference to a medicinal product but omits any activity required to manufacture or supply the active… [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
Contact Employment Lawyer Peter A. [read post]
